The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Resident Evil 5'.
Capcom are preparing for the earth-shattering announcment of Resi 5...
Taken from cube-europe.com:
Recent actions by Capcom seems to suggest they are looking down the line of developing this game...
Capcom have bought and registered the domain name www.residentevil5.com, on browsing over to that very address you'll be presented with the ever pleasing 'under construction' page but still, a strong hint that this game is on the way? Those currently playing Resident Evil Zero will certainly be hyped if it is...
That info is scratchy at best, but as a quick question, are most of you guys getting a little bored of Resi? Yes, Resi Zero (from what I've read) seems to be excellent, and the original Resi came into to a great reception, but after installments 2+3 this summer and Resi 4 following soons after, I think I'll be feeling a little Resi-stant of them...
Taken from cube-europe.com:
Recent actions by Capcom seems to suggest they are looking down the line of developing this game...
Capcom have bought and registered the domain name www.residentevil5.com, on browsing over to that very address you'll be presented with the ever pleasing 'under construction' page but still, a strong hint that this game is on the way? Those currently playing Resident Evil Zero will certainly be hyped if it is...
That info is scratchy at best, but as a quick question, are most of you guys getting a little bored of Resi? Yes, Resi Zero (from what I've read) seems to be excellent, and the original Resi came into to a great reception, but after installments 2+3 this summer and Resi 4 following soons after, I think I'll be feeling a little Resi-stant of them...
Page:
I'll stand by Unbeliever here. His posts cover a superbly wide vocabulary.
Which reminds me... word of the week...
it'll have to wait for tomorrow now.
Which reminds me... word of the week...
it'll have to wait for tomorrow now.
Whitestripes wrote:
> Wow, I can see you like to keep an open mind. If you weren't so busy
> dribbling down your shirt and trying to get to grips with going to the
> toilet by yourself; you might just stop for a second and consider the
> fact that many people happen to like the Resident Evil games, and I
> don't doubt for a second that a large proportion of them are far more
> intelligent and independant than you.
>
> Well, you are telling me to go to hell because I disagree with your
> opinion, that says 'moron' to me.
And you talking about me "dribbling down my shirt and trying to get to grips with going to the toilet by myself" because you don't agree with my opinion says exactly the same thing to me.
>
> Oh, and stop stringing together uncommonly used words in an attempt to
> 'get one up'. It doesn't make you look big or clever, and you don't
> write that way in your other posts.
Yes, I do. Look around a bit and you'll see. I routinely use this language in everyday life. If it's beyond your ability to understand it, that's not my fault.
> Wow, I can see you like to keep an open mind. If you weren't so busy
> dribbling down your shirt and trying to get to grips with going to the
> toilet by yourself; you might just stop for a second and consider the
> fact that many people happen to like the Resident Evil games, and I
> don't doubt for a second that a large proportion of them are far more
> intelligent and independant than you.
>
> Well, you are telling me to go to hell because I disagree with your
> opinion, that says 'moron' to me.
And you talking about me "dribbling down my shirt and trying to get to grips with going to the toilet by myself" because you don't agree with my opinion says exactly the same thing to me.
>
> Oh, and stop stringing together uncommonly used words in an attempt to
> 'get one up'. It doesn't make you look big or clever, and you don't
> write that way in your other posts.
Yes, I do. Look around a bit and you'll see. I routinely use this language in everyday life. If it's beyond your ability to understand it, that's not my fault.
Unbeliever wrote:
>
> Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
>
> No it doesn't. It's exactly like having a rant about any game I
> dislike. I've played it, I didn't like it and I'll tell people that I
> didn't like it. If they don't agree with that statement then fine -
> it's their prerogative. And they can go to hell. Which is probably
> where a pedantic chthonic mentalist like you is headed.
Well, you are telling me to go to hell because I disagree with your opinion, that says 'moron' to me.
Oh, and stop stringing together uncommonly used words in an attempt to 'get one up'. It doesn't make you look big or clever, and you don't write that way in your other posts.
>
> Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
>
> No it doesn't. It's exactly like having a rant about any game I
> dislike. I've played it, I didn't like it and I'll tell people that I
> didn't like it. If they don't agree with that statement then fine -
> it's their prerogative. And they can go to hell. Which is probably
> where a pedantic chthonic mentalist like you is headed.
Well, you are telling me to go to hell because I disagree with your opinion, that says 'moron' to me.
Oh, and stop stringing together uncommonly used words in an attempt to 'get one up'. It doesn't make you look big or clever, and you don't write that way in your other posts.
Whitestripes wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
>
>
> So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games?
> Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original
> Resident
> Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who
> bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked"
> franchise? NOWHERE.
>
>
> You're implying it's a milked franchise by saying people are
> easily-led into buying it. I mean, you'd never say someone was
> easily-led into buying an original and innovative game like Pikmin
> would you?
Yes, if it was hyped up and rubbish I would. The Getaway had an original concept about it but people were easily led in buying it. And that was pretty poor.
The RE remake on the GC had a lot of hype attributed to it and I ididn't like the game when I bought it.
> And either way, this statement:
>
> "Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS
> can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
>
>
> Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
No it doesn't. It's exactly like having a rant about any game I dislike. I've played it, I didn't like it and I'll tell people that I didn't like it. If they don't agree with that statement then fine - it's their prerogative. And they can go to hell. Which is probably where a pedantic chthonic mentalist like you is headed.
> Unbeliever wrote:
>
>
> So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games?
> Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original
> Resident
> Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who
> bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked"
> franchise? NOWHERE.
>
>
> You're implying it's a milked franchise by saying people are
> easily-led into buying it. I mean, you'd never say someone was
> easily-led into buying an original and innovative game like Pikmin
> would you?
Yes, if it was hyped up and rubbish I would. The Getaway had an original concept about it but people were easily led in buying it. And that was pretty poor.
The RE remake on the GC had a lot of hype attributed to it and I ididn't like the game when I bought it.
> And either way, this statement:
>
> "Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS
> can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
>
>
> Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
No it doesn't. It's exactly like having a rant about any game I dislike. I've played it, I didn't like it and I'll tell people that I didn't like it. If they don't agree with that statement then fine - it's their prerogative. And they can go to hell. Which is probably where a pedantic chthonic mentalist like you is headed.
Unbeliever wrote:
>
> So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games?
> Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original Resident
> Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who
> bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked"
> franchise? NOWHERE.
You're implying it's a milked franchise by saying people are easily-led into buying it. I mean, you'd never say someone was easily-led into buying an original and innovative game like Pikmin would you?
And either way, this statement:
"Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
>
> So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games?
> Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original Resident
> Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who
> bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked"
> franchise? NOWHERE.
You're implying it's a milked franchise by saying people are easily-led into buying it. I mean, you'd never say someone was easily-led into buying an original and innovative game like Pikmin would you?
And either way, this statement:
"Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
Still makes you look like a gibbering buffoon.
Whitestripes wrote:
> I was targeting your statement that everyone who buys the next
> Resident Evil games is an ill-informed idiot who is easily led into
> buying another 'milked' franchise, and therefore are sheep.
And I said: "Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games? Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original Resident Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked" franchise? NOWHERE.
I'll stand by my original statement about the ORIGINAL Resident Evil because I believe it's true.
> I was targeting your statement that everyone who buys the next
> Resident Evil games is an ill-informed idiot who is easily led into
> buying another 'milked' franchise, and therefore are sheep.
And I said: "Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can go to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT."
So where's the reference to "next" Resident Evil games? Nowhere. Yes, the majority of people who bought the original Resident Evil are easily led automatons just like the majority of people who bought Vice City. Where is the reference to a "milked" franchise? NOWHERE.
I'll stand by my original statement about the ORIGINAL Resident Evil because I believe it's true.
> Unbeliever wrote:
> *snarls in rage*
>
> Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can
> go
> to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT.
>
> *snarls in rage*
>
> Resident Evil is rubbish. Any EASILY-LED AUTOMATAN NINCOMPOOPS can
> go
> to hell IF THEY DON’T AGREE WITH THAT.
>
You're assuming too much here. I quite clearly stated that I think the original Resident Evil was rubbish and any people who disagree with that sentiment can go to hell.
I made no reference to future Resident Evil games and if you looked down the post, you will see that I will buy RE 4 if they change the control system.
So you can stick you wild insinuations and assumptions where the sun doesn't shine. If you had a whit of valid reasoning to back up your point I might agree with you. But you've paraphrased what I said to your own ends which is pathetic and childish.
I made no reference to future Resident Evil games and if you looked down the post, you will see that I will buy RE 4 if they change the control system.
So you can stick you wild insinuations and assumptions where the sun doesn't shine. If you had a whit of valid reasoning to back up your point I might agree with you. But you've paraphrased what I said to your own ends which is pathetic and childish.
I was targeting your statement that everyone who buys the next Resident Evil games is an ill-informed idiot who is easily led into buying another 'milked' franchise, and therefore are sheep.
Which is complete rubbish, and you only look a bigger moron for saying so.
Which is complete rubbish, and you only look a bigger moron for saying so.
In what way?
You've accused me of not having an open mind. I have by buying the first instalment. I didn't like it. I read that none of the control issues of the first instalment had been rectified, namely the controls, which I despise. It would be easy for Capcom to introduce an Eternal Darkness type control system but they decided not to. If you like the game, go ahead and enjoy it. Just don't expect others who hate it to agree with you, or to agree with the majority of people who like it.
You've accused me of not having an open mind. I have by buying the first instalment. I didn't like it. I read that none of the control issues of the first instalment had been rectified, namely the controls, which I despise. It would be easy for Capcom to introduce an Eternal Darkness type control system but they decided not to. If you like the game, go ahead and enjoy it. Just don't expect others who hate it to agree with you, or to agree with the majority of people who like it.
Page: