Viewing Thread:
"It's official"

The Gamecube is naff

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews
/2003Mar/gee20030312019061.htm

Kyz22 wrote:
> Shadow Knight wrote:
> coming from a site called geek I hardly think that clarifies the
> Gamecube as naff in any way shape or form. I happen to think the
> Gamecube is a jem with some appealing titles on it, unlike the PS2.
>
> Give this man a medal, you are a man, right... &-)

*wears medal*
yes i'm a bloke

Shadow Knight wrote:
> coming from a site called geek I hardly think that clarifies the
> Gamecube as naff in any way shape or form. I happen to think the
> Gamecube is a jem with some appealing titles on it, unlike the PS2.

Give this man a medal, you are a man, right... &-)

Yes, the gamecube is rubbish because Dixons had trouble selling them due to their outrageous pricing policy.

Yes, yes. That works.

coming from a site called geek I hardly think that clarifies the Gamecube as naff in any way shape or form. I happen to think the Gamecube is a jem with some appealing titles on it, unlike the PS2.

Just look at the URL and see who is "naff"

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews
/2003Mar/gee20030312019061.htm

How many times does the word "Geek" need to be repeated before it sinks in you wierd bespeccles side-parted lump!

Just seeing the link didn't make me want to go there.

Virtuoso wrote:
> Thank you for making this topic.
>
> Now I get to see this piece of news again; just in case I might have
> missed it the 10 times before that....

Thanks for your sarcasm...still in response it does need to be said again that due to releasing the Gamecube way after the PS2, what did Nintendo expect.

Thank you for making this topic.

Now I get to see this piece of news again; just in case I might have missed it the 10 times before that....

The Gamecube is naff

http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews
/2003Mar/gee20030312019061.htm