The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have been extremely irritated by the complete plonkers including the gimps who slow clapped Blair on tonight.
These imbeciles say "saddam must be removed but violence is not the way to do it", They moan incessantly when war is suggested. Yet when the question of how to over turn his regime is asked of them, they haven't got an answer.
The argument war will cause thousands of deaths is pretty crap. The regime staying in power will cause as many if not more deaths in the long run, and effect all the peoples standard of living. War is clearly the lesser of two evils.
Economic sanctions haven't worked and have been tried already.
(the invasion of France, although amusing is not really viable)
(Anyone who says it should be resolved democratically by another party in iraq, may be laughed at!)
A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable alternative.
And i may rant profusely at anyone who deflects the subject, with an anti war speech, or war is wrong speech; instead of actually providing a proper alternative solution.
These imbeciles say "saddam must be removed but violence is not the way to do it", They moan incessantly when war is suggested. Yet when the question of how to over turn his regime is asked of them, they haven't got an answer.
The argument war will cause thousands of deaths is pretty crap. The regime staying in power will cause as many if not more deaths in the long run, and effect all the peoples standard of living. War is clearly the lesser of two evils.
Economic sanctions haven't worked and have been tried already.
(the invasion of France, although amusing is not really viable)
(Anyone who says it should be resolved democratically by another party in iraq, may be laughed at!)
A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable alternative.
And i may rant profusely at anyone who deflects the subject, with an anti war speech, or war is wrong speech; instead of actually providing a proper alternative solution.
Page:
Ashley wrote:
> A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable
> alternative.
Maybe Bush, Blair and Saddam could get themselves around a table and play Buckaroo.
> A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable
> alternative.
Maybe Bush, Blair and Saddam could get themselves around a table and play Buckaroo.
Like we don't have anyone far enough removed from the SAS to be able to make a hit without coming up against too much trouble.
But anyway, Saddam is reputed to have a number of look-alikes as precautions against just such action.
But anyway, Saddam is reputed to have a number of look-alikes as precautions against just such action.
I'm repeating what I've just posted in life, but never mind;
Reason why the SAS cannot take him out ? The SAS trained his bodygaurd unit in the 1980s. oops.
:D
Reason why the SAS cannot take him out ? The SAS trained his bodygaurd unit in the 1980s. oops.
:D
I don't understand why we can't send the SAS in to do a professional hit.
Job Done. No leader, no real powerful figurehead and, hopefully, the threat of force will be enough to persuade the rest of the country's army (including Saddam's military force) to step down and accept the regim change. But I have a feeling they'll end up dying on their homeland.
*looks around*
Oi! Who posted this in chat?
*runs to the Life forum*
Job Done. No leader, no real powerful figurehead and, hopefully, the threat of force will be enough to persuade the rest of the country's army (including Saddam's military force) to step down and accept the regim change. But I have a feeling they'll end up dying on their homeland.
*looks around*
Oi! Who posted this in chat?
*runs to the Life forum*
Hey, we've done this whole thing to death in the Life forum, there's endless posts..... still, as we're about (possibly) two days from it all starting.....
It's quite right that many oppose war, but when it comes to viable alternatives they're mostly in cloud cuckoo land in terms of them ever actually working. Saddam did indeed get 100% of the votes, however only a portion of the the Iraqi people were even allowed to vote anyway, hence it was about as fair as Zimbabwe's elections.
It's quite right that many oppose war, but when it comes to viable alternatives they're mostly in cloud cuckoo land in terms of them ever actually working. Saddam did indeed get 100% of the votes, however only a portion of the the Iraqi people were even allowed to vote anyway, hence it was about as fair as Zimbabwe's elections.
Hey, we've done this whole thing to death in the Life forum, there's endless posts..... still, as we're about (possibly) two days from it all starting.....
It's quite right that many oppose war, but when it comes to viable alternatives they're mostly in cloud cuckoo land in terms of them ever actually working. Saddam did indeed get 100% of the votes, however only a portion of the the Iraqi people were even allowed to vote anyway, hence it was about as fair as Zimbabwe's elections.
It's quite right that many oppose war, but when it comes to viable alternatives they're mostly in cloud cuckoo land in terms of them ever actually working. Saddam did indeed get 100% of the votes, however only a portion of the the Iraqi people were even allowed to vote anyway, hence it was about as fair as Zimbabwe's elections.
Berserko wrote:
> If they rush in all guns blazing they are just as bad as Saddam.
Utter Rubbish!
Saddam has proved that after 12 years of being told to disarm in a peaceful manner that he doesn't understand peaceful means of disarmourment. If it took a country as powerful and as big as Russia 6 years to disarm, why has it taken Iraq 12 so far?
If Saddam wanted to solve this problem peacefully he would have by now. If you're anti-war then I presume you have no idea what your talking about. But if you're pro-war, then you'll have to agree that it can't end with just sorting out Iraq.
> If they rush in all guns blazing they are just as bad as Saddam.
Utter Rubbish!
Saddam has proved that after 12 years of being told to disarm in a peaceful manner that he doesn't understand peaceful means of disarmourment. If it took a country as powerful and as big as Russia 6 years to disarm, why has it taken Iraq 12 so far?
If Saddam wanted to solve this problem peacefully he would have by now. If you're anti-war then I presume you have no idea what your talking about. But if you're pro-war, then you'll have to agree that it can't end with just sorting out Iraq.
If they rush in all guns blazing they are just as bad as Saddam.
Exactly. There is NO way to remove him without war. I am also angrey at people having a go at blair. I rekon the US would have already atatcked iraq if he hadn't been diplomatic.
Anyway noone should care what france thinks.
And germany and russia do not have very good histories involving war...
Saddam has kiled over 1 million of his own people since he came to power. When he was re elected he had 100% of the votes. Well sorry but i will never believe that was a fair election. Anti war protestors really need to see the light and realise they are wrong. But then whatever you do people protest.
Anyway noone should care what france thinks.
And germany and russia do not have very good histories involving war...
Saddam has kiled over 1 million of his own people since he came to power. When he was re elected he had 100% of the votes. Well sorry but i will never believe that was a fair election. Anti war protestors really need to see the light and realise they are wrong. But then whatever you do people protest.
I have been extremely irritated by the complete plonkers including the gimps who slow clapped Blair on tonight.
These imbeciles say "saddam must be removed but violence is not the way to do it", They moan incessantly when war is suggested. Yet when the question of how to over turn his regime is asked of them, they haven't got an answer.
The argument war will cause thousands of deaths is pretty crap. The regime staying in power will cause as many if not more deaths in the long run, and effect all the peoples standard of living. War is clearly the lesser of two evils.
Economic sanctions haven't worked and have been tried already.
(the invasion of France, although amusing is not really viable)
(Anyone who says it should be resolved democratically by another party in iraq, may be laughed at!)
A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable alternative.
And i may rant profusely at anyone who deflects the subject, with an anti war speech, or war is wrong speech; instead of actually providing a proper alternative solution.
These imbeciles say "saddam must be removed but violence is not the way to do it", They moan incessantly when war is suggested. Yet when the question of how to over turn his regime is asked of them, they haven't got an answer.
The argument war will cause thousands of deaths is pretty crap. The regime staying in power will cause as many if not more deaths in the long run, and effect all the peoples standard of living. War is clearly the lesser of two evils.
Economic sanctions haven't worked and have been tried already.
(the invasion of France, although amusing is not really viable)
(Anyone who says it should be resolved democratically by another party in iraq, may be laughed at!)
A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable alternative.
And i may rant profusely at anyone who deflects the subject, with an anti war speech, or war is wrong speech; instead of actually providing a proper alternative solution.
Page: