Viewing Thread:
"anti war gimps!"

I have been extremely irritated by the complete plonkers including the gimps who slow clapped Blair on tonight.

These imbeciles say "saddam must be removed but violence is not the way to do it", They moan incessantly when war is suggested. Yet when the question of how to over turn his regime is asked of them, they haven't got an answer.

The argument war will cause thousands of deaths is pretty crap. The regime staying in power will cause as many if not more deaths in the long run, and effect all the peoples standard of living. War is clearly the lesser of two evils.

Economic sanctions haven't worked and have been tried already.

(the invasion of France, although amusing is not really viable)

(Anyone who says it should be resolved democratically by another party in iraq, may be laughed at!)

A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable alternative.

And i may rant profusely at anyone who deflects the subject, with an anti war speech, or war is wrong speech; instead of actually providing a proper alternative solution.

HalloHowArtThou wrote:
> Alternative?
>
> Leave Saddam alone then he won't do anything

possibly the most moronic statement i have read on this site. He has alread fired missiles on 7 neighbouring countries before without proper provocation. Bin Laden was left alone and it didn't stop him blowing up the american embassies. Im not quite sure if i can remember Kaiser Wilhelm's provocation either.

Why isn’t everyone turning their attention more on Korea, they're far more of a threat than Saddam.

Alternative?

Leave Saddam alone then he won't do anything

oh well, thats a great point.

obviously me being slightly over zealous in my attack on anti war protestors proves war is the wrong course of action!

This is the perfect example of what i mean. Anti war protestors have no other solution so just pick on petty little things like you have, to avoid having to actually provide an alternative.

Calling someone else a gimp shows how week you think your argument is.

assassinating saddam would in reality be pretty pointless anyway. Saddam hussein is just the face of his regime. Kill him, one of his cronies wwill step into his place. They need to take over iraq, so they can restructure its political regime completely.

Totoro you havn't claimed your GAD yet

Ashley wrote:
> A Prize for the person who actually can suggest a reasonable
> alternative.

Here was my idea:

http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ space display_messages.php?threadid=70092&forumid=423

*slow claps Ashley*

cookie monster wrote:

> Maybe Bush, Blair and Saddam could get themselves around a table and
> play Buckaroo.

LOL...best idea yet...make sure it's done with the rest of the security council from the UN present to make sure theres no cheating ;o)