Viewing Thread:
"A puzzle for yous all..."

My first is in biscuit but never in cake
My second's in awesome but not in great
My third is in mother but not seen in dad
My fourth is in sunny but never in sad
My fifth is a vowel found in water not creek
My sixth is found only in one day of the week
My seventh's two of three that you learn when you're young
My eighth's not in song but it's there when it's sung
My ninth's in eleven and twelve, not thirteen
My tenth is in island and river, not stream
My eleventh's in precious and secret and paste
My twelfth is in phantom and spectre and haste
My whole stalks the night in a quiet dreamlike state
With no memories the next day of being out late

Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Hang on,
>
> so someone else got blamed, but not sarah or anyone we dont know
> about?
>
> Did mary get the blame

yes

, just not arrrested for some reason?

This statemant isn't correct.

Ineedsleep wrote:
> Is it something to do with a law?
>

Yesish

> Had Mary previously been married to Sarah's husband

No

Hang on,

so someone else got blamed, but not sarah or anyone we dont know about?

Did mary get the blame, just not arrrested for some reason?

Is it something to do with a law?

Had Mary previously been married to Sarah's husband

Simon Says wrote:
> Rosalind wrote:
> Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands killer,
> but Mary was never brought to justice. Why?
>
>
> "Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands
> killer"
>
> is this statement true, or should it read given Sarah new she hadn't
> killed her husband, Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her
> husbands killer.

No. My statement is the correct one.

Drunk Cow wrote:
> Sarah and Mary are twins. Mary killed Sarah's husband but the police
> thought it was Sarah because they look alike. Thereforeshe didn't get
> her justice and what-not because they look alike...blah blah
>
> Am I right now.

Not even close.

Rosalind wrote:
> Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands killer,
> but Mary was never brought to justice. Why?
>

"Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands killer"

is this statement true, or should it read given Sarah new she hadn't killed her husband, Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands killer.

Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Was anyone blind?
No

> Is the manner of death important?
No
but certain ways wouldn't have been possible

Sarah and Mary are twins. Mary killed Sarah's husband but the police thought it was Sarah because they look alike. Thereforeshe didn't get her justice and what-not because they look alike...blah blah

Am I right now.

Ineedsleep wrote:
> This thread is moving fast
>
> Is it a plot for a new Columbo show

hehe

I think its based on a true story.