The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
weres the games ps2 has all the games.
Page:
Mantis wrote:
> It really bloody isn't.
Why the bloody hell not?
> It really bloody isn't.
Why the bloody hell not?
You people argue far far too much!
Can't we all just get along?
Xbox sucks.
GC sucks.
I'm not sure if the PS2 has a fan so I'm not sure if it sucks.
Ah, they both blow too...
Can't we all just get along?
Xbox sucks.
GC sucks.
I'm not sure if the PS2 has a fan so I'm not sure if it sucks.
Ah, they both blow too...
Hmm, banning in process I suppose.
wrote:
> i don't substance on the xbox for 1 reason the controller to fond of ps2 controll for mgs2.
> i don't substance on the xbox for 1 reason the controller to fond of ps2 controll for mgs2.
wrote:
> yo maverick42 i hear you man your right .
> yo maverick42 i hear you man your right .
Maverick wrote:
> It's the bloody truth though.
It really bloody isn't.
> It's the bloody truth though.
It really bloody isn't.
wrote:
> yo daveus getting all hype over a video game system man that's not cool . what you need to do is get outside more punk go get a date or something boy. act like you live in a video game sun of bycth.
> yo daveus getting all hype over a video game system man that's not cool . what you need to do is get outside more punk go get a date or something boy. act like you live in a video game sun of bycth.
It's the bloody truth though.
Maverick wrote:
> The Xbox has a crap back-catalogue because there's only one must-have game, one or two pretty good ones and the rest being below that. Much less than can be said for it's two competitors.
Thats complete crap. But I'll let you away with it becuase I know you're a stubborn git. :P
> The Xbox has a crap back-catalogue because there's only one must-have game, one or two pretty good ones and the rest being below that. Much less than can be said for it's two competitors.
Thats complete crap. But I'll let you away with it becuase I know you're a stubborn git. :P
Daveus wrote:
> so Maverick, i'll ask again..as you gave me a crappy, immature answer
> like someone talking to someone on the phone saying what they wanna
> say and then hanging up "oh, and substance is better on
> PS2". how does PS2 have better games? and how is MGS2 better on
> PS2? the Xbox versaion's the same with heaps more on it. the "oh,
> and substance is better on PS2" isin't proof, not even a theory.
> you just said that without backing it up. Xbox don't have a crap
> catalogue either! tell me why you think this too
Crappy? Immature? I said what I needed to say and stopped, saving you the hassle of a long boring post. But since you asked..
The PS2 has better games because it's been out longer. You'd expect it to. In terms of exclusives, any decent game the Xbox has, the PS2 can match it with two or three of equal quality. That's not opinion, it's a fact. Something of equal truth however, and in the Xbox's defense, is that the PS2 has an extremely disappointing 2003 line-up, while the Xbox's is really rather strong. Because of this, I'll soon own all three consoles.
Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance may support Dolby 5.1 on the Xbox, and be out earlier, but that's it. As some of the graphical effects were originally coded for PS2, you'll experience slowdown on the Xbox version. In addition to this, the PS2 has some exclusive features such as the skateboarding mini-game. That's why the PS2 version is better.
The Xbox has a crap back-catalogue because there's only one must-have game, one or two pretty good ones and the rest being below that. Much less than can be said for it's two competitors.
> so Maverick, i'll ask again..as you gave me a crappy, immature answer
> like someone talking to someone on the phone saying what they wanna
> say and then hanging up "oh, and substance is better on
> PS2". how does PS2 have better games? and how is MGS2 better on
> PS2? the Xbox versaion's the same with heaps more on it. the "oh,
> and substance is better on PS2" isin't proof, not even a theory.
> you just said that without backing it up. Xbox don't have a crap
> catalogue either! tell me why you think this too
Crappy? Immature? I said what I needed to say and stopped, saving you the hassle of a long boring post. But since you asked..
The PS2 has better games because it's been out longer. You'd expect it to. In terms of exclusives, any decent game the Xbox has, the PS2 can match it with two or three of equal quality. That's not opinion, it's a fact. Something of equal truth however, and in the Xbox's defense, is that the PS2 has an extremely disappointing 2003 line-up, while the Xbox's is really rather strong. Because of this, I'll soon own all three consoles.
Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance may support Dolby 5.1 on the Xbox, and be out earlier, but that's it. As some of the graphical effects were originally coded for PS2, you'll experience slowdown on the Xbox version. In addition to this, the PS2 has some exclusive features such as the skateboarding mini-game. That's why the PS2 version is better.
The Xbox has a crap back-catalogue because there's only one must-have game, one or two pretty good ones and the rest being below that. Much less than can be said for it's two competitors.
Page: