The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Most magazines have the same layout, they always start with an editorial where the editor says things like "The office has been quiet, except for the sound of button bashing from the monkeys because we've got HUNDREDS of EXLUSIVE games sent to us for review this issue!!!!!!"
We don't really need to know that, do we?
Then there's the gossip section, the US/JAP news section, the previews, the reviews, the charts, and then a bunch of rubbish at the back, all of which you could just as easily find on the World Wide Web. Except on the WWW it wouldn't all be a month out of date.
I think the only reason, in truth, that we buy the gamer magazines is for the DVD stuck to the front of it, with all those nice demos on it. I mean £3.49-£3.99 for the DVD alone may be considered pretty good value considering what you get with most of them.
I think in future that the publishers should just release the DVD stuck to a piece of cardboard, rather than stuck to a glossy magazine with pretty pictures, the purpose of which seems to ram the writers' opinions down your throat because 'they know best'.
Most magazines have the same layout, they always start with an editorial where the editor says things like "The office has been quiet, except for the sound of button bashing from the monkeys because we've got HUNDREDS of EXLUSIVE games sent to us for review this issue!!!!!!"
We don't really need to know that, do we?
Then there's the gossip section, the US/JAP news section, the previews, the reviews, the charts, and then a bunch of rubbish at the back, all of which you could just as easily find on the World Wide Web. Except on the WWW it wouldn't all be a month out of date.
I think the only reason, in truth, that we buy the gamer magazines is for the DVD stuck to the front of it, with all those nice demos on it. I mean £3.49-£3.99 for the DVD alone may be considered pretty good value considering what you get with most of them.
I think in future that the publishers should just release the DVD stuck to a piece of cardboard, rather than stuck to a glossy magazine with pretty pictures, the purpose of which seems to ram the writers' opinions down your throat because 'they know best'.
Anyone who buys NOM though, should be shot.
From a cannon, into a bed of nails coated in ethanol.
The other reason is...to be honest.... i'd rather not be infront of a screen for everything i do. I like sitting down in my room with the magazine and reading reviews/previews/news.
Someone sent me a demo of Tom Clancy's Ghost recon this morning. Not sure why as i haven't got any other of the Rainbow 6 series. Its real good actually. I was impressed
FantasyMeister wrote:
I think in future that the
> publishers should just release the DVD stuck to a piece of cardboard,
They did... there were a couple out at one time or another, for about 3.99 you got the CD with game demos and shareware on... Instead of a mag attached there was more of a leaflet thing telling you how to intstall the titles...
> Magazines are losing the battle against web sites. It'll be a while before
> they're extinct, but as you said, why pay, say, £3 to get information you
> could just get on the web. And the web info is more uptodate.
Especially as broadband begins to creep into the mass use...
Game demos will take minutes to download instead of hours... and with a perminant connection, you will be able to get your computer to grab groups of demos as you sleep?