Viewing Thread:
"Join The R.S.P.C.N"

I have formed this group because of the recent topics about being cruel to newbies.

Something has to be done about it so this group is the answer the R.S.P.C.N, (The Royal Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Newbies)

It's a group wich if any member of the group sees unfair treatment of Newbies they report the people who are guilty. it's a bit Like the recent SPAMBUSTERS.

If you want to join put post your nickname.

Grix Thraves wrote:
> Bloody hell. If you want to find the intelligent newbies, start a topic saying
> they're crap.

I know, it's just typical isn't it...

I agree doughnut monster the Notable Hunmter wasn't the fun loving hunter you know today it was originally set up against the new system i asked why can't we all be the same. Now Newbies are like Children and Notables are like Gods its stupid why can't we all be the same?

Some Newbies post good stuff like JC superstar's new post whilst others post drivel but its only drivel if a newbie posts it if a Regular does its called funny. I hate being stereotyped in a group as far as im concerned im no Regular, Notable or Newbie i'm Dringo and thats all i can say on the matter. Another thing Newbies need to post tonnes to become a regular so posting rubish is an impulse created by the system just thought i'd point that out.

All the topics seem to end up as arguements don't they??
Especially when it's a 'Sony v Nintendo' one, but lets not even go down that worn out path.

Bloody hell. If you want to find the intelligent newbies, start a topic saying they're crap.

VenomByte wrote:
> Might be something to do with the fact that just about
> all newbies try to post decent stuff


Eh? Wot forumz yoo bin reedin den?

I have only recently joined the forums but I think its apparant that a lot of the regulars are often more guilty of posting topics with no real purpose. I think the whole rating system is stupid, as it doesnt matter how long youve been here, its what youve done in that time.

I am the Tarrant wrote:
> Totoro wrote:
> You seem to treat so called newbies like children, who don't
> have an opinion,
> when some of them, although newbie to the s.r chatrooms,
> know more about games
> than many regulars.


What would you know?

I bet many of you have been playing games since the days of the Spectrum, Atari 2600 etc.
So have i, so i know quite a bit about games.
Just because my name doesn't have a gold/brownish tinge to it doesn't mean much does it?

Why, personally, I make fun of newbies:

They take themselves far too seriously.

I don't think any of the... well, most of the regulars don't take themselves seriously.

That's the problem, you see.

Totoro wrote:
> You seem to treat so called newbies like children, who don't have an opinion,
> when some of them, although newbie to the s.r chatrooms, know more about games
> than many regulars.


What would you know?

I can't help it. My reticular formation keeps telling me I am.

;)