Viewing Thread:
"MARIO KART GC SCREENSHOTS!"

Wooooooooo

And Pikmin 2, but meh:

http://www.nintendo-europe.com/NOE/en/GB/ news/article.jsp?ElementId=3242d393 -f4c5-4e00-89fd-b50a67eedcc5

It's classical anyways, how cool are you, anyway?

Looks like each character gets their own kind of kart, Whacky Races style. Detail is superb.

Must see this running. Roll on the E3! Woo

I don't mind the new carts... it hardly matters.

Great! - this game really could be near-to-completion, after all! :D

I also prefer the old-style karts to these new ones, but I think this whole 2-in-1-kart idea could be quite interesting...

I love the look of the graphics, and it's great to see 16 racers this time, instead of just 8.

But does this all mean we're not going to be able to have 8 different players, in 8 INDIVIDUAL karts, racing at the same time - after linking 2 GameCube's together?? I hope not. :(

I fail to see how having 2 players controlling one-kart could really be anywhere near as-fun.

Surely what we see here cannot be ALL there is to know...?? :S

I still think the carts look crap...

Retarded prams...
something you would find in a Kinder Egg...

and last but not least, with thanks from MWA for this one...

Peach is riding a D**do.

Indeed. Get the damn Go Karts back dammit. We don't want an ortistic version of Speed Freaks dammit!

Shinra wrote:
> Maverick42 wrote:
> Timesplitters 2 is better than Halo.
>
>
>
> There is no 'pft' long enough for what you have just said.

Yeah there is... its a non-existant one cause he was right.

I love the new look Mario Kart... what a day of games.

Arggggggh Mario GC how cool!!!!!

Mmmmmmmmmmmm, Mario Kart ::drool::

Would anyone actually be dissapointed if they just tarted up the graphics?

It's different, at least Nintendo can't be accused of releasing the same game and just tarting up the graphics.

Hopefully there'll be an Isle Delfino track.

I agree with him.

And I want want want Mario Kart.

Maverick42 wrote:
> Timesplitters 2 is better than Halo.
>


There is no 'pft' long enough for what you have just said.