The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Enter the Matrix'.
The first review I've seen of the game just popped up, head over to
http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/
launchreview.asp?reviewid=182831
It's very amaturishly written, but he seemed to have a blast with the game. Anybody else got their hands on this game early? What'd you think of it?
http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/
launchreview.asp?reviewid=182831
It's very amaturishly written, but he seemed to have a blast with the game. Anybody else got their hands on this game early? What'd you think of it?
Page:
erm, i didn't read any of that. apart from a glimpse of Maverick's while i was scrolling to see what i said. it said "Paid? By whom?" i'm guessing critics get paid by their employer maybe. i dunno why some of you aren't impressed by this game. the actors from the films are seriously impressed. true matrix fans would love this. like me. bottom line here is, i love it - that's how i feel. you don't - that's how you feel. nothing's gonna change that. end of.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Daveus wrote:
> 4/10? that's bullcrap! this game rocks!
>
> Oh give it up, would you? Stop trying to justify your purchase with
> rubbish like this. Instead, why not analyse our arguments and return
> with a little style? You'd be taken a hell of a lot more seriously.
>
> the Essex Chronicle has given Matrix Reloaded three stars. i haven't
> talked ot anyone yet who's seen it but i guarentee you they'll say
> that
> three stars for Matrix Reloaded is rat crap!
>
> I'm sorry - but that argument is 'rat crap'. For one, The Essex
> Chronicle is not a specialist film magazine - so really, what do they
> know? Secondly, you can't possibly compare them to GamesTM - whose
> staff play each game to total completion and are all respected
> industry experts.
>
> bottom line, don't believe everything you read. they're paid to do
> it
>
> Paid? By whom? Aswell as stating that they won't be swayed by PR talk
> or bribes at the beginning of their news section, who on earth would
> pay them to rate a game poorly? To be honest, while a lot of people
> dismiss reviews on the grounds of 'opinions differ', I find them
> extremely accurate and an excellent representation of how good a game
> is. Well, GamesTM's, anyway.
And you can give sites that rate it well,also give your review,say what is good and never be defeated in an arguement!
> Daveus wrote:
> 4/10? that's bullcrap! this game rocks!
>
> Oh give it up, would you? Stop trying to justify your purchase with
> rubbish like this. Instead, why not analyse our arguments and return
> with a little style? You'd be taken a hell of a lot more seriously.
>
> the Essex Chronicle has given Matrix Reloaded three stars. i haven't
> talked ot anyone yet who's seen it but i guarentee you they'll say
> that
> three stars for Matrix Reloaded is rat crap!
>
> I'm sorry - but that argument is 'rat crap'. For one, The Essex
> Chronicle is not a specialist film magazine - so really, what do they
> know? Secondly, you can't possibly compare them to GamesTM - whose
> staff play each game to total completion and are all respected
> industry experts.
>
> bottom line, don't believe everything you read. they're paid to do
> it
>
> Paid? By whom? Aswell as stating that they won't be swayed by PR talk
> or bribes at the beginning of their news section, who on earth would
> pay them to rate a game poorly? To be honest, while a lot of people
> dismiss reviews on the grounds of 'opinions differ', I find them
> extremely accurate and an excellent representation of how good a game
> is. Well, GamesTM's, anyway.
And you can give sites that rate it well,also give your review,say what is good and never be defeated in an arguement!
Daveus wrote:
> 4/10? that's bullcrap! this game rocks!
Oh give it up, would you? Stop trying to justify your purchase with rubbish like this. Instead, why not analyse our arguments and return with a little style? You'd be taken a hell of a lot more seriously.
> the Essex Chronicle has given Matrix Reloaded three stars. i haven't
> talked ot anyone yet who's seen it but i guarentee you they'll say that
> three stars for Matrix Reloaded is rat crap!
I'm sorry - but that argument is 'rat crap'. For one, The Essex Chronicle is not a specialist film magazine - so really, what do they know? Secondly, you can't possibly compare them to GamesTM - whose staff play each game to total completion and are all respected industry experts.
> bottom line, don't believe everything you read. they're paid to do it
Paid? By whom? Aswell as stating that they won't be swayed by PR talk or bribes at the beginning of their news section, who on earth would pay them to rate a game poorly? To be honest, while a lot of people dismiss reviews on the grounds of 'opinions differ', I find them extremely accurate and an excellent representation of how good a game is. Well, GamesTM's, anyway.
> 4/10? that's bullcrap! this game rocks!
Oh give it up, would you? Stop trying to justify your purchase with rubbish like this. Instead, why not analyse our arguments and return with a little style? You'd be taken a hell of a lot more seriously.
> the Essex Chronicle has given Matrix Reloaded three stars. i haven't
> talked ot anyone yet who's seen it but i guarentee you they'll say that
> three stars for Matrix Reloaded is rat crap!
I'm sorry - but that argument is 'rat crap'. For one, The Essex Chronicle is not a specialist film magazine - so really, what do they know? Secondly, you can't possibly compare them to GamesTM - whose staff play each game to total completion and are all respected industry experts.
> bottom line, don't believe everything you read. they're paid to do it
Paid? By whom? Aswell as stating that they won't be swayed by PR talk or bribes at the beginning of their news section, who on earth would pay them to rate a game poorly? To be honest, while a lot of people dismiss reviews on the grounds of 'opinions differ', I find them extremely accurate and an excellent representation of how good a game is. Well, GamesTM's, anyway.
Hehe
Maybe he's the owner of SHiny or something?
Maybe he's the owner of SHiny or something?
10/10...
Hahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahaha
10/10. 100%. 5 stars.
if you find it too easy, Beanz, put it on hard setting.
if you find it too easy, Beanz, put it on hard setting.
I would give it 5 or 6 out of ten! Took mine back today an traded
it in and got moto gp2.
it in and got moto gp2.
I'd give it 4/10 too.
And Matrix Reloaded is average.
All hype no trousers in The Matrix universe.
And Matrix Reloaded is average.
All hype no trousers in The Matrix universe.
i've got it...completed both characters...etc
and i'd give it 6/10
got some cool elements about it but it's too easy, driving and flying bits suck, missions a bit bland, some crap animations, just can't see myself going back and playing it all over again
cool bullet time though and nice fmv...fills in some gaps for the film. anyways i'm offto trade it in now...to get skies of arcadia :D
and i'd give it 6/10
got some cool elements about it but it's too easy, driving and flying bits suck, missions a bit bland, some crap animations, just can't see myself going back and playing it all over again
cool bullet time though and nice fmv...fills in some gaps for the film. anyways i'm offto trade it in now...to get skies of arcadia :D
4/10? that's bullcrap! this game rocks! i always go be my mate's opinions than what i read by some critic. most people on here have said good things about the game. with films too. the Essex Chronicle has given Matrix Reloaded three stars. i haven't talked ot anyone yet who's seen it but i guarentee you they'll say that three stars for Matrix Reloaded is rat crap! bottom line, don't believe everything you read. they're paid to do it
Page: