The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I must be an idiot.
Excuse me while I go and jibber incessantly in the corner.
> Whitestroipes wrote:
>
> Yeah, but that's like saying "How do we know nuclear war is a
> bad
> thing? Perhaps we should try it and it might turn out to be really
> good."
>
> hmm, yeah, thats definately a great comparison...games/nuclear war.
> of course, why didnt i think of that before, the two 'genres' are
> exactly the same!
Duh isnt that the whole point of Red Alert?
> Only you, and other gimps like Stryke, slate everyone who doesn't
> think The Matrix is the best film ever. And here you are exclaiming
> your annoyance at people who judge a game without owning it. I doubt
> if you'd noticed, but both actions are remarkably similar.
Whatever, chuckles. If you can find one instant of me slating someone for not liking the Matrix, I'll bow down and fulfil your every wish. I could find a dozen examples (and I have the means, though not the will to do so) of you popping into a thread, making an ill-informed comment then desperately trying to cover your tracks when called on it by farting around with sarcastic remarks. In the meantime, enjoy your lifetime of writing clever comebacks without actually answering the accusations thrown at you. Take it easy.
I'm off to play games and eat sandwiches.
> And the blind, incessant sarcastic comments from people like
> WhiteStripes are the reason that Nintendo fans are generally viewed on
> the whole as red-faced fanboys and are laughed at and mocked with big
> pointy sticks. And the reason I'll stay out of this forum from now on
> too, I'm sure I won't be missed.
*sniggers*
> So you think Universal Studios could be good? You realise that you
> walk around a recreation of the actual park, and pick up litter.
>
>
> Have you changed your mind yet?
hmm, as far as i can tell, i never said Universal studios would be good, infact, i sed that since there was no positive support for it that it is crap...
> Whitestroipes wrote:
>
> Yeah, but that's like saying "How do we know nuclear war is a
> bad
> thing? Perhaps we should try it and it might turn out to be really
> good."
>
> hmm, yeah, thats definately a great comparison...games/nuclear war.
> of course, why didnt i think of that before, the two 'genres' are
> exactly the same!
>
> come on, that was a pretty stupid point to make...
Not really, it's just an over the top comparison.
So you think Universal Studios could be good? You realise that you walk around a recreation of the actual park, and pick up litter.
Have you changed your mind yet?
> Yeah, but that's like saying "How do we know nuclear war is a bad
> thing? Perhaps we should try it and it might turn out to be really
> good."
If no-one has tried Nuclear missles before, then how do WE know it's bad. ANd maybe it IS good. No-one's tried it, the effects of the radiation could counteract each other and heal all injuries. Eh? eh?
I rest my case.
Splinter cell, Burnout 2, Skies of Arcadia, Nba street 2...
> Yeah, but that's like saying "How do we know nuclear war is a bad
> thing? Perhaps we should try it and it might turn out to be really
> good."
hmm, yeah, thats definately a great comparison...games/nuclear war.
of course, why didnt i think of that before, the two 'genres' are exactly the same!
come on, that was a pretty stupid point to make...