Viewing Thread:
"Final Fantasy Forum"

The game forums are closing, so i am moving the popular FF forum here. No spamming, just 100% FF. Let's start with a question.... which of the FFs is the best?

It was FF8-ey, which is a bad thing if you see what i mean.

the FF movie was diabolical. there was nothing FF about it except the name

i think the final fantasy movie was the reason why they got in money problems in the first place, why could they have not just made a summurised version of ff7.

¦¦ lvlägmä Ðrägòón ¦¦ wrote:
> yeah bundling ff7, 8, 9 and selling for about £40 would be very good value
> (they still sell for like £20 each) and besides think of the length of
> playability it would have, ff7 alone in 60 hours long, and it would not put
> square in more money problems, instead would help them out.

If Square are having money problems they'll sell them all seperately. You know how money grabbing they are. FFX was £44.99 in the last SR mag! (I don't have the new one yet)

gah, 10 million that is alot of money (depends if you mean't to say 10 million yen which is about £2)

Hmmm, good idea, but with money problems they might not be able to afford to revamp them all. FFX cost over 10 Million, what with all the musicians, artists and the hundreds of staff involved

yeah bundling ff7, 8, 9 and selling for about £40 would be very good value (they still sell for like £20 each) and besides think of the length of playability it would have, ff7 alone in 60 hours long, and it would not put square in more money problems, instead would help them out.

i thought sony buying a big old chunk of square helped them out and also what better way to make money then this little bundle

It'll never happen - Square are having money problems, remember?

well if all 3 of them were put together in a bundle maybe with FF tactics and the anthology then i'd pay £40 for it