The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Cancelled my online order and decided to treck down to the shops and get one, I hate waiting.
So far I'm not at all impressed.....with the weight, only took me about 5 minutes to get home, in that short space of time I had to keep swapping arms that I was carrying the bag in because they were aching so much. Thank god the shops are only a few minutes from my house, i'd have had to get a taxi otherwise. What really made me laugh was the girl behind the till put the console in a bag and as she was passing it to me, the handles broke.
Anyway I got Halo (of course) MGS2: Substance and Jet Set Radio Future. So far from what i've played of Halo it's gonna be a bloody brilliant game, excellent mass battle type things and most of the guns rock my socks. ONe thing I don't like is the bit on the 2nd level where you have to drive the Warthog, those things handle terribly, i just wanted to get out and shoot stuff normally. Small gripe though because the rest of the stuff i've done rocked.
JSR: future from what i've played is gonna be just as good as the 1st game if not better, not particuarly enthralled by the new graffiti method or the lamp post climbing but i'll get used to it.
Haven't bothered with MGS2 yet.
So far so good then, first product i've ever owned from Microsoft that i've been completly satisfied with.
So far I'm not at all impressed.....with the weight, only took me about 5 minutes to get home, in that short space of time I had to keep swapping arms that I was carrying the bag in because they were aching so much. Thank god the shops are only a few minutes from my house, i'd have had to get a taxi otherwise. What really made me laugh was the girl behind the till put the console in a bag and as she was passing it to me, the handles broke.
Anyway I got Halo (of course) MGS2: Substance and Jet Set Radio Future. So far from what i've played of Halo it's gonna be a bloody brilliant game, excellent mass battle type things and most of the guns rock my socks. ONe thing I don't like is the bit on the 2nd level where you have to drive the Warthog, those things handle terribly, i just wanted to get out and shoot stuff normally. Small gripe though because the rest of the stuff i've done rocked.
JSR: future from what i've played is gonna be just as good as the 1st game if not better, not particuarly enthralled by the new graffiti method or the lamp post climbing but i'll get used to it.
Haven't bothered with MGS2 yet.
So far so good then, first product i've ever owned from Microsoft that i've been completly satisfied with.
Page:
Whitestripes DX wrote:
Are you so stupid as to
> think it would be ideal for me to provide a long list of games I like,
> every time I say something negative about another game?
--
Only when you stress about how repetitive it is and how it's one corridor yadda yadda yadda.
If you're going to proffer opinion on what makes a good level design, then provide an example.
Anyone can slam something, it's not hard
Are you so stupid as to
> think it would be ideal for me to provide a long list of games I like,
> every time I say something negative about another game?
--
Only when you stress about how repetitive it is and how it's one corridor yadda yadda yadda.
If you're going to proffer opinion on what makes a good level design, then provide an example.
Anyone can slam something, it's not hard
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Played a 3-player game with all vehicles, Sniper Rifles and infinite
> grenades last night, and I'm telling you, it can't be beat.
Sounds like someone is trying to enforce an opinion on everyone.
Goatboy will have to tell you off for that, but of course he won't.
> Played a 3-player game with all vehicles, Sniper Rifles and infinite
> grenades last night, and I'm telling you, it can't be beat.
Sounds like someone is trying to enforce an opinion on everyone.
Goatboy will have to tell you off for that, but of course he won't.
So what games do you like?
Goatboy wrote:
> Because I promise you, whatever your favourite game is, I can pull it
> down.
>
> It's personal opinion, and why people expend so much energy trying to
> change someone else's opinions always strikes me as pointless.
>
...
Who said I was trying to change opinions? I'm giving my opinion and nothing more.
And making games too realistic makes them crap. I've said it many times before, the real world is boring - so setting a game as close to the real world as possible results in a boring game. A real library may very well be huge and consist of the same shape and layout throughout, but surely they had the sense to realise this would make a very boring and dull game.
And why would I want to list games I like? The discussion in this thread was about Halo, so I added my opinion. If it was a thread about Splinter Cell, I would have added my opinion. Are you so stupid as to think it would be ideal for me to provide a long list of games I like, every time I say something negative about another game?
And stop jumping to accusations, I haven't even said Halo was bad, I said the indoor levels get boring because they only use one wall texture and 3 different shaped rooms to make it out of.
I would say Halo is 'very good but does not break new ground'.
> Because I promise you, whatever your favourite game is, I can pull it
> down.
>
> It's personal opinion, and why people expend so much energy trying to
> change someone else's opinions always strikes me as pointless.
>
...
Who said I was trying to change opinions? I'm giving my opinion and nothing more.
And making games too realistic makes them crap. I've said it many times before, the real world is boring - so setting a game as close to the real world as possible results in a boring game. A real library may very well be huge and consist of the same shape and layout throughout, but surely they had the sense to realise this would make a very boring and dull game.
And why would I want to list games I like? The discussion in this thread was about Halo, so I added my opinion. If it was a thread about Splinter Cell, I would have added my opinion. Are you so stupid as to think it would be ideal for me to provide a long list of games I like, every time I say something negative about another game?
And stop jumping to accusations, I haven't even said Halo was bad, I said the indoor levels get boring because they only use one wall texture and 3 different shaped rooms to make it out of.
I would say Halo is 'very good but does not break new ground'.
Every game can be reduced to 'ones and zeros'. Machine code which is repetitive. Now beat that!
Every game is reduced to moving a pad, or mouse and pressing buttons or keys. Beat that for repetitive.
Unless it's a light gun game, or Steel Battalion.
Unless it's a light gun game, or Steel Battalion.
I suppose any FPS can be reduced to 'Move. Shoot. Move. Shoot'. So in a sense all FPS games are repetitive. Still good though.
Oh yes, the vehicles...that's what sets it above the FPS shooters....how the hell did I forget about the vehicles?
Played a 3-player game with all vehicles, Sniper Rifles and infinite grenades last night, and I'm telling you, it can't be beat.
Halo is a great game but not as good as I imagined it would be. It's best in mulitplayer. However, it does impress when played with full audio (i.e. 5.1 surround sound).
I found it to be a tad too repetitive at times and why Edge rated it 10/10 has, quite frankly, amazed me.
I found it to be a tad too repetitive at times and why Edge rated it 10/10 has, quite frankly, amazed me.
Page: