The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Goldeneye: Rogue Agent'.
Check the latest story on er-no.com
Thats actually all from reliable sources.
Looks like we are in for a shock treat in 2004.
I think so!
Thats actually all from reliable sources.
Looks like we are in for a shock treat in 2004.
I think so!
Page:
Goldeneye had the 'vehicle levels' though. Just rembering those should help in seeing PD's 'true greatness'. :D
And a lot of Goldeneye's multiplayer player levels didn't give players many paths to take.
And a lot of Goldeneye's multiplayer player levels didn't give players many paths to take.
PD was good but it feels like .. Goldeneye with beefed up graphics, Alien Storyline, more multiplayer options, more mutliplayer arenas and more guns.
Yes it is what Goldenye is meant to be but a few things let it down, some of the new PD Multiplayer levels are awful, single player starts okay but when she meets the alien dude it becomes very tedious and to be hones=st Goldeneyes mission objectives on some missions are better, dont take me wrongly it was a GOOD game but not superb because of some parts of the game.
Yes it is what Goldenye is meant to be but a few things let it down, some of the new PD Multiplayer levels are awful, single player starts okay but when she meets the alien dude it becomes very tedious and to be hones=st Goldeneyes mission objectives on some missions are better, dont take me wrongly it was a GOOD game but not superb because of some parts of the game.
§niper wrote:
> The PD engine is years old so i doubt it .. it was the most overhyped
> game i have ever got but yes it was enjoyable but it wasn't great.
> They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something
> similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
What did you find wrong about PD over Goldeneye?
> The PD engine is years old so i doubt it .. it was the most overhyped
> game i have ever got but yes it was enjoyable but it wasn't great.
> They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something
> similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
What did you find wrong about PD over Goldeneye?
Perfect Dark was superb.
It was everything Goldeneye was and then some.
It was everything Goldeneye was and then some.
Notorious Biggles wrote:
>
> Damn. The last time they did that we got Tomorrow Never Dies. They go
> back to first person and we get The World Is Not Enough. First person
> is better.
IGN reckon it works well with the extra stuff EA are trying to do. They're including hand to hand combat with various objects (wine bottles etc) as weapons.
>
> Damn. The last time they did that we got Tomorrow Never Dies. They go
> back to first person and we get The World Is Not Enough. First person
> is better.
IGN reckon it works well with the extra stuff EA are trying to do. They're including hand to hand combat with various objects (wine bottles etc) as weapons.
§niper wrote:
> The PD engine is years old so i doubt it .. it was the most overhyped
> game i have ever got but yes it was enjoyable but it wasn't great.
> They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something
> similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
I preffered PD to be honest.
> The PD engine is years old so i doubt it .. it was the most overhyped
> game i have ever got but yes it was enjoyable but it wasn't great.
> They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something
> similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
I preffered PD to be honest.
Nintendo had far more say with the Goldeneye game because it was Nintendo that bought the license. Nintendo will have the ability to ask EA to make a remake of the classic title... EA and Nintendo are very good friends lately. As I say it is all very believable... but not neccessarily true...
It is perfectly possible that Nintendo or Retro are making the game but with EA's permission for use of the license (with the normal cut of course) aka Metal Gear Solid. Nintendo asked Silicon to make the game and Konami agreed as long as they get some of the revenue from it... it costs them nothing to make and they get a cut because of the name, its like free money.
We'll see...
It is perfectly possible that Nintendo or Retro are making the game but with EA's permission for use of the license (with the normal cut of course) aka Metal Gear Solid. Nintendo asked Silicon to make the game and Konami agreed as long as they get some of the revenue from it... it costs them nothing to make and they get a cut because of the name, its like free money.
We'll see...
Oops i mean 'but' not 'butto' ..
The PD engine is years old so i doubt it .. it was the most overhyped game i have ever got but yes it was enjoyable but it wasn't great.
They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
They should try, make their own engine butto keeping to something similar to Goldeneye and NOT PD.
Hedfix wrote:
> TGMbloke wrote:
>
> If it was a platformer thougher though...A bond platformer...Now,
> Nintendo would make that special!
>
> That's true. And EA have made the next Bond third person........
Damn. The last time they did that we got Tomorrow Never Dies. They go back to first person and we get The World Is Not Enough. First person is better.
> TGMbloke wrote:
>
> If it was a platformer thougher though...A bond platformer...Now,
> Nintendo would make that special!
>
> That's true. And EA have made the next Bond third person........
Damn. The last time they did that we got Tomorrow Never Dies. They go back to first person and we get The World Is Not Enough. First person is better.
Page: