The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Heavily rumoured and would kill off opposition from Sony. Nintendo and their second/first parties develop around 30 games a year with 95% of which reaching status of a very good game and at least 40% being treated amongst the greatest games of recent years.
Rumours have been started from insiders when Microsoft expressed interest in the venture and Nintendo also seemed intrigued. The concept isn't too ridiculous, despite both thriving in the market Nintendo and Microsoft are vastly falling behind industry leader Sony. Microsoft's main goal is to get itseld as the industry leader whilst Nintendo's also shares the aim but desires to continue producing fresh and innovative games amongst others.
Nintendo's EAD head Shigeru Miyamoto, seen as the greatest games designer in the world ever, has made comments surrounding Microsoft. Stating that "Machine strength needs to be dynamic, although (X-box's) power is phenomonal and presents many oppertunities it doesn't have the dynamic structure of Gamecube", he also said commenting on the rumours "(laughing) Well with Microsoft's Money i guess it means there'd be no stopping Nintendo"
More as it comes.
Like Marathon 2. Crap, but the coolest intro music ever.
But Bungie become part of "Microsoft Game Studios" don't they?
Ah screw it, It does'nt really matter, most M.G.S games suck, except the RTS titles cause I love em.
Bungie is owned by Microsoft.
Difference.
Microsoft's actual games studio are rubbish, and so unimaginative it's painful just to think about.
"Microsoft Flight Simulator 98"
Rise of Nations?
Age of Empires 2?
Star Wars Galactic battlegrounds?
**********
Ok I understand what your saying....
"Microsoft are good at *Publishing* "fun" and "mature" games"
That's crap too.
Microsoft Games Studios suck.