The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If consoles would hurry up and get connected, we could be playing PD online, Tekken tourament for real, and even online RPG's. Dreamcast took a brave step, but stumbled and paid the cruel price for failed orginality in the games market. Sometimes good idea's pay off (goldeneye) sometimes they dont, but the game companies should always try.
I personally can't wait until the PS2 goes online (later this year or early the next, but Sony are hideously unreliable so its a case of wait and see) and gets a keyboard and its own screen. It will be totally cool.
I'm not sure what nintendo's plan is, but i think that it will be equally cool. When consoles finally all get online, we will all be playing each other on quake 5, even if we all have pc's ps2's and gamecubes, and that is the first step to peace in the neverending console wars.
> What I've always wondered, is this:
Why are Nintendo, masters of innovation,
> sitting on the back seat with regards to online gaming?
I remember reading
> that they said they were doing fine as it is, and had no need to.
Not very
> ambitious, is it? Doesn't sound like the industry trendsetters paving the way
> for the future, does it?
I couldn't agree more.
Apparently, "Nintendo gamers prefer to play local people and just want four player games so Nintendo will only have local networks for this".
It was a bit of a stupid servey.
Ofcourse Nintendo players prefer 4 player games with local people because at the moment it's the only option they have!!
If they'd asked Snes players then they would've been told then no one really cares about 4 player games.
Then would we have Goldeneye and Mario Kart?
Nintendo need to move forward with a link cable (2 TV's, 2 Gamecubes + 8 players takes gaming to a new dimension) and broadband internet (that means being able to play anyone in the world at the click of a button).
Perhaps we're wrong and Nintendo are just down-hyping the situation.
> What I've always wondered, is this:
Why are Nintendo, masters of innovation,
> sitting on the back seat with regards to online gaming?
I remember reading
> that they said they were doing fine as it is, and had no need to.
Not very
> ambitious, is it? Doesn't sound like the industry trendsetters paving the way
> for the future, does it?
ah
phantasy star online for GC
GC will have modem and broadband adapters that fit under neatith it.
Sorry bout spellin
Why are Nintendo, masters of innovation, sitting on the back seat with regards to online gaming?
I remember reading that they said they were doing fine as it is, and had no need to.
Not very ambitious, is it? Doesn't sound like the industry trendsetters paving the way for the future, does it?
If consoles would hurry up and get connected, we could be playing PD online, Tekken tourament for real, and even online RPG's. Dreamcast took a brave step, but stumbled and paid the cruel price for failed orginality in the games market. Sometimes good idea's pay off (goldeneye) sometimes they dont, but the game companies should always try.
I personally can't wait until the PS2 goes online (later this year or early the next, but Sony are hideously unreliable so its a case of wait and see) and gets a keyboard and its own screen. It will be totally cool.
I'm not sure what nintendo's plan is, but i think that it will be equally cool. When consoles finally all get online, we will all be playing each other on quake 5, even if we all have pc's ps2's and gamecubes, and that is the first step to peace in the neverending console wars.