Viewing Thread:
"List for me your games and rate them accordingly"

.... please!

Just interested to know what games everyone has and what you think of em.

I'll go first :

Halo - Superb, brilliant, can't say a bad word about it. Roll on H2

Splinter Cell - Thoroughly enjoyed, one of the best games I've played in ages.

MGS2:Substance - Also superb, enjoyed it start to finish. would prefer that gimp raiden was replaced with snake though .....

PGR - One of the finest racers ever. Does it beat Gran Turismo? In some aspects yes, in the 'user-definable' category, no.

SSX Tricky - First snowboard game I've played and very good, very quick, fun to play, great music

Burnout 2 - Not exactly realistic in any way, but if it's arcade thrills you want, this is very good. The overall speed of the game and crashes make it exhilarating. Prefer PGR though.

FIFA 2003 - Very good football game, good fun on one player, but great fun on multiplayer.

Max Payne - A great game, played all the way through as soon as I got it. Ageing a bit I suppose, but still extremely good and one of my favourites.

Mech Assault - Good fun for a while, although the one player does get a little tedious. I need LIVE really to play it properly. Still, not bad.

Morrowind - Played for a few hours, couldn't really get into it. I realise it is a very detailed RPG of the highest quality, but it just didn't grab me. Maybe I'll get into it more in the future.

KOTOR - Very, very good. Welcome to the star wars universe, detailed, user definable, and with a great story. Haven't got far yet, but am enjoying it a lot.

Enter the Matrix - loved it when I got it, after several hours it quickly got repetitive though. Still, the fighting is very good, and I enjoyed all the FMV. Yet to finish.

Ok, that's all I got .....

The Josh wrote:
> Whitestripes DX wrote:
> One tiny point to justify it's above average score despite all it's
> listed faults would do.
>
> even though I despise his existence,

Does intelligent life frighten you that much?


You must do suppose, you wouldn't be on these forums so much otherwise...

Whitestripes DX wrote:
> One tiny point to justify it's above average score despite all it's
> listed faults would do.

even though I despise his existence, he's got a point ;-)

One tiny point to justify it's above average score despite all it's listed faults would do.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> What were you expecting?
> a 20 page review containing all my thoughts about the game?

I was. ;)

Like I said. Its better than Nightfire and slightly above average.

I gave Nightfire 4/10 and average is 5/10. What were you expecting? a 20 page review containing all my thoughts about the game?

It is actually, you wrote absolutely nothing positive about it. You said it was only worth two hours entertainment.


You shouldn't be surprised if someone fails to understand how that could possibly be classed as 'above average'.

I don't like multiplayer games yet the Xbox version heavily focus' on multiplayer. Is an above average game hense the 6/10 score. Its not hard to work out...

Its above average, average being 5/10.

Is called opinion.

That's called opinion menso.


I meant you literally suck at ranking, for example:


"State of Emergency - 6/10

Ok for a couple of hours and after that I didn't touch it. Repetitive gameplay along with sub standard graphics mar this title from being any worth shouting about."



What? You've basically said this game is a pile of sh|t and then given it 6 out of 10! A '6' in my book is a 'good' game, if I had written that about a game you could have expected it to score about 3/10.

Thats coming from a person who rates Halo has just above average...

I see.