The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The only rule i am making is that u can only chose one or another
I personaly take gameplay because you don't want a mind numingly boaring game unless its really cheap and/or has a good multi-player
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Well seeing as this is the Sony forum I
> would predict that most of
> you would go for graphics
>
:P
and seeing as your a nintendo fan that means you are a
> pokemon freak
No I don't like Pokemon because im over 12 years old, oh and people who like Pokemon aren't freaks there just mentally unstable
> Well seeing as this is the Sony forum I would predict that most of
> you would go for graphics
:P
and seeing as your a nintendo fan that means you are a pokemon freak
> Hmm. This is a debate I have little patience with. Everyone always
> says gameplay in an attempt to prove to everyone else that they
> aren't shallow. Dont worry people, no-one will judge you by that (at
> least no-one you will care about being judged by)
The question is
> how many of you would even consider a game brought out on a modern
> console with 4 bit graphics, regardless of gameplay. I wouldnt mind
> betting that very few of you would.
To finish off on a really
> nit-picking note (I love this :-)), wht good is gamplay if there are
> no graphics to see it with? I leave you with that thought.
This is wat i'm tryin' to get out of people one or the other yet your right bout graphics
:P
(smackdown3)
The question is how many of you would even consider a game brought out on a modern console with 4 bit graphics, regardless of gameplay. I wouldnt mind betting that very few of you would.
To finish off on a really nit-picking note (I love this :-)), wht good is gamplay if there are no graphics to see it with? I leave you with that thought.