Viewing Thread:
"BE VERY CAREFUL IN WHAT YOU SAY"

Obviously their are very strong feelings across the democratic world regarding the actions of yesterday.

Clearly there are extremist factions responsible who need to be brought to justice, and people harbouring them and funding them who also need to be punished.

However, the vast majority of people from all races would condemn the actions of yesterday. This is the work of mad extremists, not the work of the general public of any country or religion.

Please TAKE CARE not to allow your comments to be racist, and have a heart for those affected by avoiding any flippant comments or warmongering statements.

We are not prepared to allow anybody to use the forums to incite hatred of any form whatsoever.

Dringo wrote:
> Oh and are you on now i dont see you?

No, I haven't had it running tonight, and I'm off now to watch some Farscape before I go to bed.

See you tomorrow.

Wòókiee Møn§†€R wrote:
> Dringo wrote:
> it could be a joke perhaps!

Without jokes it would be sad and my friencd Megaman who i never met was killed aswell, he helped run my site, i wish to think about him for a while.

Oh and are you on now i dont see you?

Dringo wrote:
> it could be a joke perhaps!

Fair enough - I'm sorry, but I'm not in the mood for jokes in these topics.

I felt bad enough, and now they say that around 200 Brits have been killed too; this for me is now personal, on a level not far behind Goatboy's loss of his uncle.



> Oh and except me on msn im jhonathan_creek

I thought I did that earlier today?

it could be a joke perhaps!

Oh and except me on msn im jhonathan_creek

Dringo wrote:
> Being stuck with a Playstation for the rest of my life
> is justice to me.

Is this really the thread to bring up console wars?

SHEEPY wrote:
> RastaBillySkank wrote:
The thing is though, Dringo, is that that
> won't happen for two reasons I can see.

1) Even George Bush isn't
> stupid enough to start using nuclear devices on people.

If he strikes they wills trike back and they might use nuclear.

2) This was the action of a
> GROUP, NOT A COUNTRY. America is not being attacked by a country, it
> is not at war with a country. It is being attacked by a terrorist
> group and is at war with a terrorist group. Got that? Not a country,
> a group. It makes (quite literally) a world of
> difference.

He said it won't just be the group but the country that holds them.

RastaBillySkank wrote:
The thing is though, Dringo, is that that won't happen for two reasons I can see.

1) Even George Bush isn't stupid enough to start using nuclear devices on people.

HMMMM the mans a nutter, but I do think the world has come along way and relise anuclear war is not the answer

2) This was the action of a GROUP, NOT A COUNTRY. America is not being attacked by a country, it is not at war with a country. It is being attacked by a terrorist group and is at war with a terrorist group. Got that? Not a country, a group. It makes (quite literally) a world of difference.

Agreed.

The thing is though, Dringo, is that that won't happen for two reasons I can see.

1) Even George Bush isn't stupid enough to start using nuclear devices on people.

2) This was the action of a GROUP, NOT A COUNTRY. America is not being attacked by a country, it is not at war with a country. It is being attacked by a terrorist group and is at war with a terrorist group. Got that? Not a country, a group. It makes (quite literally) a world of difference.

America bommed, america will attack back, world war 3, nuclear bombing, nuclear winter, end of world.

We need to stop it happening now.

I would never dream of swearing in any of my posts and this subject is too sensitive to be controversial.