GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Bored with playing games now"

The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sun 02/09/01 at 02:43
Regular
Posts: 787
Sorry but it's true.

Haven't touched my PS2 for a game in about 3 months now.
I played GT3 when a mate brough it over for a while, and we revisited Smackdown 2 for a laugh - But that's the 1st time in a long time I've used it for anything other than movies.
I do play PC games quite a bit, but have found them less and less interesting.

I don't know why that is. Same old games?
Max Payne is top, something radically new and exciting.
Completed it in 2 days.

Operation Flashpoint is good fun, but I only play that multi-player online with my boys, can't be bothered with the single-player campaign missions.

Train Simulator - At least it was different. I made fun of it, but it was like nothing else out there. Worth a laugh.

So I went back and revisted some old PC games I haven't touched in over a year.
System Shock 2 is ok, but just "run around ship, find key, use key, get out".
Even tried Counterstrike online but got bored with watching Clan Clowns win over and over and over again.

Why is this? Why am I growing weary with computer games?
There are some titles coming out that I will buy, Silent Hill 2, MGS2 and they should be good.
I played a demo of Red Faction on the PC, tutorial was awesome, but within 5 minutes of playing the 1st level, I was just running through mines shooting people.
*sigh*
I want something new, I want something to come along and completely blow me away, surprise and shock me.
MGS2 will be good, but again it's much of a muchness. Run here, hide and shoot.

There have been gaming moments that have made me smile with the freshness of them. Metal Gear Solid, hunting high and low for the frequency to contact someone, only to discover the code is on the back of the box.
THAT is what I want more of, developers using their ingenuity instead of just pumping more polygons in and upping the pixels.
Played Serious Sam on the PC.
That was a brilliant game, just run about shooting things.
No brain to it, no plot, no puzzles to solve, just pure shooting and running.

That was such a nice break from the "new gameplay" that is being rammed down my throat.
Black and White - when that was released, I was genuinely pleased with it. Seemed to be new and startingly innovative.
But it's not.
You train your creature for a bit, it learns and does it by itself.
That game is taking over villages, that's it.
Cast miracle, plant houses, take over village.
The end.

Is it that hard to come up with something original instead of just repeating old successes?
PC Gamer reports that since the release of Max Payne, other developers have been stealing the ideas of bullet-time etc and implementing them in their own games.
Hello?
Did it not occur to these people that the reason Max Payne has taken the gaming world by storm is that is has things never seen before?
In a few months, every game will have these little tricks, but we'll have seen them and be bored by them.

Where's the fun? Where are the new ideas? Where's the thing that will make me go "Jesus, that's stunning!"
I loved Metal Gear Solid, the hiding and stealth.
MSG2 will have nice graphics etc, but the idea is old now.
I trust Hideao has more little ideas like the code on the CD box, just a little something, a spark of originality.

Maybe that's why I'm not excited by The Gamecube.
Mario Worlds
Zelda's something-or-other
I'm sure they're good games, but I've played them before somewhere else.

I thought the PS2 would offer something stunning, but it hasn't done yet. There hasn't been a title (for me) that has made me sit-up and thank the lord that I paid £300 for a DVD player. I've played my original PSX games more than PS2 on that.

PC is used for multi-player mainly, because with real people, you can still be surprised by the events.

I just look around at video-games and see very little that is breaking new ground and amazing me.
Maybe that will change, maybe it won't, but I'll hang on in just in case.
Sun 02/09/01 at 15:12
"I love yo... lamp."
Posts: 19,577
Well that is one way of putting it. I know how you feel, I call it Game Burn-out. Basically after playing games heavily for several years, or if it is the same genre, months you become bored. It all seeems the same, you have beaten the game or at least put it in the can't-get-any-further in pile. The only answer is to take a break for a while, at least from your (formerly) favourite genre. You have to seek out those elusive games that you feel happy playing. An example that I have been through is with Goldeneye. I spent so long playing that game. When TWINE came out I stopped playing Goldeneye. It was almost 6 months before I played it again. By then I had not played TWINE for about 3 months. In gaming terms I moved on. I bought other games from different genres. i bought Ridge Racer 64. Vigilante8 was another along with Mario Party. Very different games. Then about 2 weeks ago I was at my cousins house in Denver. I wanted to play a game of some sort. I had been playing V-Rally a lot until I went away. And when I got there I saw sitting in the middle of the floor, an N64. Complete with Goldeneye. I rediscovered the joy of playing it. I again became acquainted with the intricacies of it. I saw and did things that I hadn't done before. I nearly completed it again. I had forgotten how hard Control was on OO Agent. Well now I am back and I stilll want to finish it. I have been experimenting with my Action Replay cartridge. And once again I want to play Goldeneye when I want to play my Nintendo. So I suggest Goatboy that you get a new game. If you do not have it or any of the sequels that you get Command & Conquer. It will remind you of a bygone age in gaming when the graphics were just not good enough to take centre stage. Back then it was the gameplay that counted. Try it online. Or if you were already heavily into strategy at one time get a flight sim. Try something different. Or in the extreme get a new console. Do you have a DC? If you do not why not get one (SR have them for £80 now) and Jet Set Radio. That is different. Or take up something like Everquest or Ultima Online or Star Trek ConQuest. Or get older games. Bet you do not have Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Rose Tattoo. Try it. Or get an emulator and try some old Spectrum games. Or why not make your own games? You can get things like Klik and Play that lets you make your own games quickly and easily. And after a few months of what ever you do go and try one of the games that you got bored with. You will find that it is not as boring as the last time. Hope it works for you, it did for me.
Sun 02/09/01 at 15:00
Regular
Posts: 9,848
I'd like to point out the irony in what Goatboy said about Nintendos games.

He said that it's Mario this, Zelda this, Donkey Kong this...

And he's right, but he's also wrong.

Apart from one or two exceptions (Like Majora's mask), despite the same characters being the the games, the gameplay changes substantially.

Mario 64 changed from the previous Mario's run from A-B and make your way through a country to go in a castle, and search for power stars to let you fight Bowser.

Zelda. The N64 game was like no other Zelda before it. Apart from the obvious 3D graphics, the puzzels were different, each boss had a unique way of being killed.
There was different things to do during night and day.
All sort of changes.

Now there's Luigi's Mansion which isn't even platforming. It's ghostbusting (which I know has been done back on a spectrum 20 years ago but I'm sure that even the dimmest of you can tell the difference in gameplay!), something that hasn't been done like this before.

Pikmin - It's not a simple real time strategy and it's not mission based. You explore an alien world assisted by flower creatures you command.


Buy a Gamecube and you'll be fulfilled. Even better, buy it with Dinosaur Planet (You always did love the Starfox team ;-D)
Sun 02/09/01 at 14:42
Posts: 0
He`s right though . Gaming is all about enjoying yourself . If a game does not do that , it is a poor game . In my opinion . But they still need some originality . I have not stopped gaming at all . At the moment I am playing my Dreamcast to death . Sonic Adventure , Crazy Taxi , DOA2 , Quake III , Fur Fighters and more . That`s what`s for me .
Sun 02/09/01 at 14:09
Regular
"You've upset me"
Posts: 21,152
I find this incredibly amusing. Whenever you come here Gronti, which is all ways sporadically, you seem to bring along with you 2 or 3 GAD deserving posts. You usually win and then we don't see you for another month or 2!!!
Sun 02/09/01 at 14:04
Posts: 0
Hmm, as far as I can see, you are missing something. You seem to be too caught up with consciously simplifying every game you get when you should be playing the game for the fun of it, rather than analysing it. If you just thought "is this game fun?" you would maybe enjoy the games more. What you probably are doing is thinking "what are the basics of this game and are they entirely original?" rather than seeing you have an enjoyable game sitting right infront of you, even if it does have elements from previous games. Games all improve by looking at what their predecessors did and adding to it. They don't just spring out of the ground, they need a seed to grow from and that seed will come from a previous gaming tree. You should be asking "what does this game have that previous ones did not?" but you're stuck on "what does this game have that has been done before?".

A 3D Platform game comes into your possession. Do you,
A:Throw it out as another platformer or
B:Play it and see that the story, puzzles and various features are original and have not actually been done before in millions of other platform games?
There may well be another option but the important thing is that you have to see that a game of a particular genre will not automatically be a clone of previous games of the same genre. Deus Ex was an FPS, but it brought so much more than shooting in the first person. It was of a reasonable length and there were many choices that could be made, including three seperate endings. It also had so many other features, such as character development, to offer. So was it just another FPS, or was it something original that had something to offer?

Is single player becoming obsolete then? It is true that a game without multiplayer has very little chance of survival in the gaming world but does this mean that single player is gone? If you've ever played a good RPG then you will know that it is possible to have good single player gameplay that lasts a very long time. Baldur's Gate allowed you to create a whole variety of characters and the many quests and sub quests in the game all had multiple ways to be completed. Baldur's Gate II multiplied this by many times and added new classes, challenges, monsters and even made class have a larger effect on the quests directly. What's more both these games have multiplayer but they don't really need it to be brilliant games, all this does is make them even better. Fallout and Fallout 2 were RPGs that had no multiplayer but they also didn't need it, bringing a totally original style of RPGing and having a high amount of freedom of things to do. Deus Ex was another game without multiplayer (originally) and it was a big success for it's single player alone. It's games like these that show how single player is not gone and that it is a vital part of the gaming industry.

With many new games bringing newer and better ideas to the gaming community, it is a matter of seeing and being grateful for the originality rather than being caught up on what has not changed.
Sun 02/09/01 at 13:24
Regular
"Back For Good"
Posts: 3,673
Everybody expected the PS2 to take over the PSone, It's a completly diferent console and hasn't even been out a year. It also takes a long time to build a good libary of games and in the next few months the PS2 has the BEST games heading it's way and the ability to play online. so be patient!!
Sun 02/09/01 at 13:20
Regular
"Infantalised Forums"
Posts: 23,089
Excellent point about the game or socialising.

I really only play when my mates come over or online.
I started an Operation Flashpoint Clan precisely because I just wanted to play and have fun.
Not do my best to always win, but have a laugh.
We have our own forums and web-site,meet up a couple of times a week to play together.

5-10 people doing their level best to run each over in tractors or steal the flag.
And we're organising a field-trip to Amsterdamn when one of us gets married later this year.
That is why I still play online, a nice sense of hanging out with mates and enjoying the game because it's people.
I tried the single player mission and kept dying, thought "Why am I even bothering with this?" and turned it off.

Batistuta was talking about Championship Manager, now I loathe football and the idea of playing that makes me shiver - but I can see the appeal for those that do like it.
Constantly changing and evolving gameplay.
More than just "Get to end of level, start new one"

GT3 was impressive, but I've played the other two. Come 1st, buy new car, come 1st etc etc.
I know I slated Train Sim over and over, but full credit to them for doing something different. At least it was more than finish the level and shoot the big-boss.
I like strategy games, Age of Empires, Cossacks etc and I'll play them to death that 1st couple of weeks then find myself thinking "I can't be bothered with doing that now" and invariably go online.

Like I said, I have faith in Metal Gear Solid 2 because of the new things in the 1st game. The code on the box, the torture thing where you had to pump the buttons - little touches that made it stand out.
Silent Hill 2 will be awesome, because that was something new.
No jumpy moments, but an unrelenting horror and nervousness.

Maybe we do expect too much, but I just don't want a shinier faster version of something I already have.
Sun 02/09/01 at 11:41
Regular
"smile, it's free"
Posts: 6,460
I'm also bored of games now, and have been for a while - with a few exceptions.

Multiplayer games.

There doesn't seem to be anything new that single player games can offer me, but multiplayer games never grow old. It never stagnates, your style always evolves and adapts to counteract your opponent - unless it's a racing game, as they're just plain dull.

The best single player games might keep me interested a week (unlikely, but possible), but the best multiplayer games I just don't tire of. I've been playing Soul Calibur since it was released, the same goes for Timesplitters and Tekken tag.

Is it the game I enjoy, or the socialising that comes with it?
Sun 02/09/01 at 11:39
Regular
"You've upset me"
Posts: 21,152
I gave up playing properly about 2 years ago. I just got so bored and tired. Now I only play if my cousin, or one of my friends comes round.

I've just given up to be honest. I'm pretty sure all that will change when the GameCube comes but until then...
Sun 02/09/01 at 09:20
Posts: 0
I have been a gamer for 8 or 9 years now and I am still chugging along happily. I sometimes go through this every now and again but maybe when gaming and online gaming become more advanced.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Continue this excellent work...
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do, I am delighted.
Second to none...
So far the services you provide are second to none. Keep up the good work.
Andy

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.