Viewing Thread:
"WWW=F European title...and the point is?"

Just been reminded that the WWF actually has a European title...and i'm asking why are thy bothering??? Matt Hardy has held it for a long time now and he doesn't seem to have a rivalry with anyone for it right now so the title is effectively dead and he doesn't even bother defending it...he just seems to wrestle tag-team matches with either his brother or more recently Chris Jericho. Has everyone else lost interest in the European title? I mean it is the lesser of three open titles in the WWF after the Heavyweight title and the IC title so no wrestlers even seem to want it. At least the HC and LHW titles hav their own divisions to make them a bit more interesting, but the European seems to have nothing? How could the WWF spice this title up a bit??? I thought it would be intersting to make it open only to competitors from Europe, but then remembered that Regal would be the only person eligible to hold it then...any ideas???

The Cong Man wrote:
> True, but i fork out £30 for sky sports 1, 2 + 3 and the only
> thing i watch is the wrestling. My favourite team - Nottingham
> Forest are never on the football and the other sports are boring 2
> watch i'd rather be playing them.


yeah i suppose, but americans have to pay about $15 for just one event while over you pay £27 for 4 raws,4 smackdowns and 1 ppv a month (excluding U.K PPV that i don't watch cause there are never any good matche and no title changes or they just win it back on the next raw)

True, but i fork out £30 for sky sports 1, 2 + 3 and the only thing i watch is the wrestling. My favourite team - Nottingham Forest are never on the football and the other sports are boring 2 watch i'd rather be playing them.

The Cong Man wrote:
> Sandshrewrules wrote:
AND
> ANYWAY WE GET PPV FREE IN ENGLAND
> ON SKY SPORTS 1 OR CHANNEL 4

You might get Skysports 1 free, but
> then I expect your dad is forking out some kind of subscription fee
> to get skyspurts in the first place, so you are paying for it, just
> not in the same way that Americans do.

Yeah but you don't just get wrestling on sky sports, u get football, rugby, cricket and other sports

da-game-man wrote:
> i agree they should definatly change the belts more often.

Think yourself lucky that they change as often as they do. i can remember in the late 70s/early 80s when Billy Graham held the WWF title belt for EIGHT YEARS!!!

Sandshrewrules wrote:
AND
> ANYWAY WE GET PPV FREE IN ENGLAND ON SKY SPORTS 1 OR CHANNEL 4

You might get Skysports 1 free, but then I expect your dad is forking out some kind of subscription fee to get skyspurts in the first place, so you are paying for it, just not in the same way that Americans do.

that did kind of ruin the story for me too

just telling the facts

Please try to avoid putting spoilers in the topics. Some people don't want to know what happens.

fine
have it your way

Sandshrewrules wrote:
> I reacken the WWF Title should not change hands that often of raw or
> smackdown because if it changes 2 often the title race gets boring
> but then again if they hold it too long it does get boring

AND
> ANYWAY WE GET PPV FREE IN ENGLAND ON SKY SPORTS 1 OR CHANNEL 4

Please stop typing in capitals!