The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
sorry sorry sorry soory ssssssssssssooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyy
please dont give me the beans!!!!!!!!!
please dont give me the beans!!!!!!!!!
Future Of Gaming (Prime Topics). BTW, there's a bit of retalitaion on FM's Thread, Monkey Man...
sim monkey man wrote:
> what the puck is the FOG version?
Future Of Gaming (prime topics)
> what the puck is the FOG version?
Future Of Gaming (prime topics)
what the puck is the FOG version?
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Meh. In the past 9 months the gap between the FOG WLT and this one
> went from being 27,000 to 15,000.
>
> Limitless pages, only 39 pages have links shown for them though. That
> is because when they used to have links to all the pages the loading
> times were ridiculous.
>
> Of course if you flip the topic and view oldest first then you get
> links to the first 39 pages.
It closed by 12,000 in a mere nine months?! Okay, let's forget about he World Record for now, let's just focus on beating FOG! By the way, does anyoen know what site the Longest Thread ever was on?
> Meh. In the past 9 months the gap between the FOG WLT and this one
> went from being 27,000 to 15,000.
>
> Limitless pages, only 39 pages have links shown for them though. That
> is because when they used to have links to all the pages the loading
> times were ridiculous.
>
> Of course if you flip the topic and view oldest first then you get
> links to the first 39 pages.
It closed by 12,000 in a mere nine months?! Okay, let's forget about he World Record for now, let's just focus on beating FOG! By the way, does anyoen know what site the Longest Thread ever was on?
Galacticdramon wrote:
> Ah, welcome! You're quote is only three hours late! Or do you live
> elsewhere in the world?
Nope just my body clock got screwed up for some reason.
> Ah, welcome! You're quote is only three hours late! Or do you live
> elsewhere in the world?
Nope just my body clock got screwed up for some reason.
Well, let's just hope FM doesn't return to this one. Let's all laugh at him when it's like this:
This Thread: 85,000 Posts (various contributors)
FM's Thread: 120 Posts (mostly by Fat Magician)
This Thread: 85,000 Posts (various contributors)
FM's Thread: 120 Posts (mostly by Fat Magician)
Galacticdramon wrote:
> Well, that bit about it not being as long as the FOG one has sure
> been proven wrong...and so might the bit about it failing! Shwos that
> even the best of us can be wrong sometimes, ssxpro! BTW, how many
> pages can one Thread have?
Meh. In the past 9 months the gap between the FOG WLT and this one went from being 27,000 to 15,000.
Limitless pages, only 39 pages have links shown for them though. That is because when they used to have links to all the pages the loading times were ridiculous.
Of course if you flip the topic and view oldest first then you get links to the first 39 pages.
> Well, that bit about it not being as long as the FOG one has sure
> been proven wrong...and so might the bit about it failing! Shwos that
> even the best of us can be wrong sometimes, ssxpro! BTW, how many
> pages can one Thread have?
Meh. In the past 9 months the gap between the FOG WLT and this one went from being 27,000 to 15,000.
Limitless pages, only 39 pages have links shown for them though. That is because when they used to have links to all the pages the loading times were ridiculous.
Of course if you flip the topic and view oldest first then you get links to the first 39 pages.
it was a wind up but now i think of it i might do it.
Ah, welcome! You're quote is only three hours late! Or do you live elsewhere in the world?
Page: