The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
Ineedsleep wrote:
> Silën† Thundêr ™ wrote:
>
> Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman
>
> See - someone who apparently knows women well :)
;-)
> Silën† Thundêr ™ wrote:
>
> Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman
>
> See - someone who apparently knows women well :)
;-)
wow! A new look! I prefer the other one. Maybe it'll grow on me.
Silën† Thundêr ™ wrote:
> Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman
See - someone who apparently knows women well :)
> Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman
See - someone who apparently knows women well :)
Galacticdramon wrote:
> Why was PS2 typed anyway, Sim? And what was the daydream about?
> Besides, it was early night when it was posted!
yeah but im tired.Early mornin tommorow as well cos i gotta go to my Uncle. Wont be here most of the day
> Why was PS2 typed anyway, Sim? And what was the daydream about?
> Besides, it was early night when it was posted!
yeah but im tired.Early mornin tommorow as well cos i gotta go to my Uncle. Wont be here most of the day
Why was PS2 typed anyway, Sim? And what was the daydream about? Besides, it was early night when it was posted!
Jive wrote:
>
> Damn right, otherwise we'd be having the house reposessed within
> about a year - typical woman - spend spend spend ;)
Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman to keep on spending, it has to better than having a woman that wont let any money at all be spent.
>
> Damn right, otherwise we'd be having the house reposessed within
> about a year - typical woman - spend spend spend ;)
Well maybe it could be considered healthy for a woman to keep on spending, it has to better than having a woman that wont let any money at all be spent.
sim monkey man wrote:
> ps2?
sorry in a daydream i hit the post message button
> ps2?
sorry in a daydream i hit the post message button
Silën† Thundêr ™ wrote:
> Heh heh, keeping her in control with a giant poking stick...
Damn right, otherwise we'd be having the house reposessed within about a year - typical woman - spend spend spend ;)
> Heh heh, keeping her in control with a giant poking stick...
Damn right, otherwise we'd be having the house reposessed within about a year - typical woman - spend spend spend ;)
ps2?
Erm, we can discuss anything we like in this thread. That's what it's here for :)
Page: