The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
The WLTRA is nearly 20,000 so that is a target, but its such a long way off that it may never be achievable.
Take one down pass it around, 98 bottles of beer.
:-)
Do that three times, and we`re there :-)
Hopefully things will get easier for posting once I`m back at uni. That way he can sign in as Officer whatever, and I can be ssxpro at uni.
> ssxpro wrote:
> Is there any point in posting PS2 related stuff
> when nobody`s
> reading anyway?
There is no point and I'm
> surprised Tony has allowed it.
I asked if there was a point in posting PS2 stuff, and you say no.
Why is that? When we`re in a PS2 forum, surely the thing to talk about is PS2 related?
Why would Tony not allow it anyway? There are allowances for longest threads so I guess it should be alright. Anyway, compared to most of the complete trash in the FOG chat this is actually quite good, so go away.