The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
Don't worry mate, It was only a joke anyway.
This thread seems to be slowing down quite rapidly, I think we need more things to talk about,
Someone needs to think of a good topic to talk about...
This thread seems to be slowing down quite rapidly, I think we need more things to talk about,
Someone needs to think of a good topic to talk about...
LordPythous wrote:
> And this one...
But thats it untill i see an apology...
Well, in that case I`m sorry, but I don`t think it could have been a shortest thread when so many threads were already one post. There are so many back from the old days that never got off the ground.
> And this one...
But thats it untill i see an apology...
Well, in that case I`m sorry, but I don`t think it could have been a shortest thread when so many threads were already one post. There are so many back from the old days that never got off the ground.
And this one...
But thats it untill i see an apology...
But thats it untill i see an apology...
Ok, bye then.
Except this one...
You ruined my shortest thread!
Not that i care but still, it's the principle!
Therefore this is the last post i write in this thread...
Not that i care but still, it's the principle!
Therefore this is the last post i write in this thread...
Skaterdude182 wrote:
> DOH sorry bout that man, anyway 800 posts wahoooooo!
About what? You helped get to 800, which is great! Doesn`t matter if the counting went off base, as long as we got there :-)
> DOH sorry bout that man, anyway 800 posts wahoooooo!
About what? You helped get to 800, which is great! Doesn`t matter if the counting went off base, as long as we got there :-)
Well, we`re there. I may go to sleep now.
Well, I took into account one of your posts, and skipped three, but I should have gone straight to one. :-)
Page: