The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
Shadowman wrote:
> They do frown on this. It is not fair if people copy reviews from
> other sites and enter GAD with them.
I know that it is wrong but din't you think it is unfair that I get banned for something my little brother did without me knowing?
> They do frown on this. It is not fair if people copy reviews from
> other sites and enter GAD with them.
I know that it is wrong but din't you think it is unfair that I get banned for something my little brother did without me knowing?
Kid Rock wrote:
shadowman you should do one.
I might once we get upto 4,700 posts.
shadowman you should do one.
I might once we get upto 4,700 posts.
hey TV BOy you got MSN? we are trying to get this thread up to 4700 before 4pm when i leave so lets try hey (as well as getting your word and post count up)
Three Kings is not bad, i watched it on Sky a couple of days ago.
Shadowman wrote:
They do frown on this. It is not fair if people copy reviews from
> other sites and enter GAD with them.
yeh because some people take a lot of time to do a review.
shadowman you should do one.
They do frown on this. It is not fair if people copy reviews from
> other sites and enter GAD with them.
yeh because some people take a lot of time to do a review.
shadowman you should do one.
Dean Holdsworth was one of them, I am not sure about the other.
Leicester now 2-0 up but Ipswich are beating Sunderland 3-0 so no change at the bottom.
Shadowman wrote:
> Leicester are 1-0 up and Bolton have had two players sent off. Looks good for 3
> points today.
Who was sent off because I have Jeskaleinen in my fantasy football team.
I know it was a mistake!
> Leicester are 1-0 up and Bolton have had two players sent off. Looks good for 3
> points today.
Who was sent off because I have Jeskaleinen in my fantasy football team.
I know it was a mistake!
Shadowman wrote:
> Leicester are 1-0 up and Bolton have had two players sent off. Looks good for 3
> points today.
WWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!1 i bet we will still lose though.
> Leicester are 1-0 up and Bolton have had two players sent off. Looks good for 3
> points today.
WWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!1 i bet we will still lose though.
Page: