The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
well gamespot game mgs2 9.6/10 which is high, ign also game it a high mark.
Ben Hodgetts wrote:
> not just cause of play but now edge has given it 8/10 i feel it's just mediocre.
However, if you look at Edge's marking scheme 5/10 is average, whereas 8/10 is excellent. You can only begin to imagine how good a 10/10 game is (Halo, Super Mario 64).
> not just cause of play but now edge has given it 8/10 i feel it's just mediocre.
However, if you look at Edge's marking scheme 5/10 is average, whereas 8/10 is excellent. You can only begin to imagine how good a 10/10 game is (Halo, Super Mario 64).
Ben Hodgetts wrote:
> FFX will be able to challenge a few of those
well i was refering to current games on the market and besides we got something like 6 months before we get the pal version of ff10.
> FFX will be able to challenge a few of those
well i was refering to current games on the market and besides we got something like 6 months before we get the pal version of ff10.
besides alot of others reviewers have given it 9/10 10/10 etc.
they all reviewed imports.
outlaw_uk2002 wrote:
> Does anyone actually feel that just because 'Play' magazine gave MGS 77% that
> it's crap?
i don't think it should deserve 77% (never)
as a game on it's own not a sequal is still brillent.
is there any game out there that can challenge Metal Gear solid 2? (i don't think so)
can any game challenge the sound track ?(maybe ssx but it's still one of the best)
can any game challenge the graphics ?(i don't think so)
can any game challenge the playability or control system? (very few)
does any games cinimatic get as good as mgs2 ?(it far surpases the cinimatic of the firt game)
so i don't think the game can get 77%.
i played the demo and it is amazing and can never with a beggining like that get 77%
what ever happen's i know the game will be one of my all time favorites even though i have'nt played it. so i don't know why and how that mag can give a score like that (i know mgs2 suffered from a lot of hype, maybe it was a miss print).
> Does anyone actually feel that just because 'Play' magazine gave MGS 77% that
> it's crap?
i don't think it should deserve 77% (never)
as a game on it's own not a sequal is still brillent.
is there any game out there that can challenge Metal Gear solid 2? (i don't think so)
can any game challenge the sound track ?(maybe ssx but it's still one of the best)
can any game challenge the graphics ?(i don't think so)
can any game challenge the playability or control system? (very few)
does any games cinimatic get as good as mgs2 ?(it far surpases the cinimatic of the firt game)
so i don't think the game can get 77%.
i played the demo and it is amazing and can never with a beggining like that get 77%
what ever happen's i know the game will be one of my all time favorites even though i have'nt played it. so i don't know why and how that mag can give a score like that (i know mgs2 suffered from a lot of hype, maybe it was a miss print).
come on any one gona post something.
Does anyone actually feel that just because 'Play' magazine gave MGS 77% that it's crap?
Page: