The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
> Kid Rock wrote:
RBS and i get on
> well same as ant but some just dont
> bother =()
RBS and Ant are not the ones I was thinking of, more the ones who
> think they run this site.
hmmm yeh i could think of a few right now!!!!!
who will be relegated back to regular though?
Go on give
> us a clue.
i can't he might read it, and get me back (besides a vote is suppose to be private)
RBS and i get on
> well same as ant but some just dont bother =()
RBS and Ant are not the ones I was thinking of, more the ones who think they run this site.
> i hope we can vote which notable we want to get rid off (as i know who i'm gona
> vote in that MUHAHAHA revenge is sweet).
Go on give us a clue.
> sherman wrote:
> i know ill probably vote kr.
I think a few will, put a
> few notables noses out of joint.
RBS and i get on well same as ant but some just dont bother =()