The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
Kid Rock wrote:
that would be hard to find,
well how hard can that be cough*me* cough
that would be hard to find,
well how hard can that be cough*me* cough
so then gotta go in a min
sherman wrote:
> i don't mind if who ever wins (as long as its not a ninty but it would make me
> happy if the winner had the same amount of posts as me, exactly the same).
that would be hard to find
> i don't mind if who ever wins (as long as its not a ninty but it would make me
> happy if the winner had the same amount of posts as me, exactly the same).
that would be hard to find
Longy:0) wrote:
> kool but do you think they'll give a GAD for the 10,000 post
well if they don't i'm going on a riot
> kool but do you think they'll give a GAD for the 10,000 post
well if they don't i'm going on a riot
Longy:0) wrote:
> kool but do you think they'll give a GAD for the 10,000 post
they did in FOG prime.
im going in a min to play the MGS2 demo again
> kool but do you think they'll give a GAD for the 10,000 post
they did in FOG prime.
im going in a min to play the MGS2 demo again
i don't mind if who ever wins (as long as its not a ninty but it would make me happy if the winner had the same amount of posts as me, exactly the same).
Kid Rock wrote:
> i want it to be someone who has never won
> before.
Errrrrrm, excuse me!
> i want it to be someone who has never won
> before.
Errrrrrm, excuse me!
kool but do you think they'll give a GAD for the 10,000 post
Longy:0) wrote:
> outlaw_uk2002 wrote:
> Shadow wrote:
> Outlaw you were the devil poster
> 6666.
Heh heh! And
> hopefully the GAD poster 10,000. But of course I'd
> rather any of you one
> instead......
yeah so do i
i want it to be someone who has never won before
> outlaw_uk2002 wrote:
> Shadow wrote:
> Outlaw you were the devil poster
> 6666.
Heh heh! And
> hopefully the GAD poster 10,000. But of course I'd
> rather any of you one
> instead......
yeah so do i
i want it to be someone who has never won before
sherman wrote:
> phew i counted it lucky for me outlaw got 6666 and i got 6667
(wait a sec is'nt
> it suppose to be 3 six's)
Four sixs are worse, unless you are playing Yahtzee
> phew i counted it lucky for me outlaw got 6666 and i got 6667
(wait a sec is'nt
> it suppose to be 3 six's)
Four sixs are worse, unless you are playing Yahtzee
Page: