The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
¦¦ lvlägmä Ðrägòón ¦¦ wrote:
> well let me count again, wait actually i think silent85 got it
I think you might be right.
> well let me count again, wait actually i think silent85 got it
I think you might be right.
well let me count again, wait actually i think silent85 got it
Right I am off, I will leave you to it. See you tomorrow for the big push.
Something went wrong with my last post.
Shadow wrote:
I have noticed that and I am on Broadband so I hate to see what it is like for you lot.
its bearable but it slows down alot when so many people are arguing.
I have noticed that and I am on Broadband so I hate to see what it is like for you lot.
its bearable but it slows down alot when so many people are arguing.
¦¦ lvlägmä Ðrägòón ¦¦ wrote:
NO NO i insist longy got it.
Now I have had chance to recount i think you are right.
NO NO i insist longy got it.
Now I have had chance to recount i think you are right.
Ben Hodgetts wrote:
> Shadow wrote:
> Ben Hodgetts wrote:
no it's not. it's damn unlucky.
>
> stupid slow internet
> anyway
Not to worry we will have a special prize
> for 10,001 just for you.
knowing my luck the prize will be for the 10,001
> post and i'll go and get the bloody 10k postSurely you'd prefer 10,002 post?
> Shadow wrote:
> Ben Hodgetts wrote:
no it's not. it's damn unlucky.
>
> stupid slow internet
> anyway
Not to worry we will have a special prize
> for 10,001 just for you.
knowing my luck the prize will be for the 10,001
> post and i'll go and get the bloody 10k postSurely you'd prefer 10,002 post?
Page: