The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
And yeah, i did see the match, well the last 20 mins :-)
Het pro evo do you go on MSN anymore?
1-0 to the Gunners, reds for Keown, Bergkamp and carrahger for throwing a coin back at the fans.
who got the red cards?? and what is the score??
Anyone watch the Arsenal VS Liverpool game? 3 reds cards there were!!!! Damn dirty boring liverpool as usual.
Oh and hi everyone!
Oh and hi everyone!
Raziel wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Raziel wrote:
> Like this -
> §ØÛL
> ®€Å¥Ë®
exept that says
> soul roayer
It dont...OK then is this better §ØÙL
> ®ËÅvÉ® ?
it did say that there was a o and y there but the new one says it
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Raziel wrote:
> Like this -
> §ØÛL
> ®€Å¥Ë®
exept that says
> soul roayer
It dont...OK then is this better §ØÙL
> ®ËÅvÉ® ?
it did say that there was a o and y there but the new one says it
Longy:0) wrote:
> Raziel wrote:
> Like this - §ØÛL
> ®€Å¥Ë®
exept that says soul roayer
It dont...OK then is this better §ØÙL ®ËÅvÉ® ?
> Raziel wrote:
> Like this - §ØÛL
> ®€Å¥Ë®
exept that says soul roayer
It dont...OK then is this better §ØÙL ®ËÅvÉ® ?
Page: