The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
Kid Rock wrote:
> hey guys only on for about 20 mins but will be on about an hour tonight
Well will catch you tonight then.
> hey guys only on for about 20 mins but will be on about an hour tonight
Well will catch you tonight then.
I was here, but I left
so nearly done my story where is every one?
hey guys only on for about 20 mins but will be on about an hour tonight
Weird Kid wrote:
Yep , he mustve registered about 8 times now. I asked him why he
> copys the whol of the last persons message instead of just the relevant writing
> , and he said so he can annoy everyone. Hope he doesn't come back .
He is not too bad, he has just upset too many people who will not give him a second chance.
Yep , he mustve registered about 8 times now. I asked him why he
> copys the whol of the last persons message instead of just the relevant writing
> , and he said so he can annoy everyone. Hope he doesn't come back .
He is not too bad, he has just upset too many people who will not give him a second chance.
Shadow wrote:
> Weird Kid wrote:
> I'm sure kottonmouth is shaneo ..he seems just like him,
> and shaun ignores me
> every time i ask him if its him :)
I thought that.
> I am sure he will be back, he likes it too much not to.
Yep , he mustve registered about 8 times now. I asked him why he copys the whol of the last persons message instead of just the relevant writing , and he said so he can annoy everyone. Hope he doesn't come back .
> Weird Kid wrote:
> I'm sure kottonmouth is shaneo ..he seems just like him,
> and shaun ignores me
> every time i ask him if its him :)
I thought that.
> I am sure he will be back, he likes it too much not to.
Yep , he mustve registered about 8 times now. I asked him why he copys the whol of the last persons message instead of just the relevant writing , and he said so he can annoy everyone. Hope he doesn't come back .
Weird Kid wrote:
> I'm sure kottonmouth is shaneo ..he seems just like him, and shaun ignores me
> every time i ask him if its him :)
I thought that. I am sure he will be back, he likes it too much not to.
> I'm sure kottonmouth is shaneo ..he seems just like him, and shaun ignores me
> every time i ask him if its him :)
I thought that. I am sure he will be back, he likes it too much not to.
Keane set up the first
The second was a follow up on a Giggs shot.
The second was a follow up on a Giggs shot.
who se them up?
Page: