The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
kid rock
why are you ignoring me?
why are you ignoring me?
Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's
> KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
>
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
>
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be
> funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't
> exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it's
> not, i don't think you read it porbably if your mad like this, just like KR,
> lol
i'm not mad. who said i was?
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's
> KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
>
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
>
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be
> funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't
> exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it's
> not, i don't think you read it porbably if your mad like this, just like KR,
> lol
i'm not mad. who said i was?
mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it's not, i don't think you read it porbably if your mad like this, just like KR, lol
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it's not, i don't think you read it porbably if your mad like this, just like KR, lol
Kid Rock wrote:
> hmm lets just forget these last posts, no one saw them ok?
what posts?
> hmm lets just forget these last posts, no one saw them ok?
what posts?
hmm lets just forget these last posts, no one saw them ok?
mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it wasnt KR needs to get a sense of humour
> Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock
> wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again
> he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a
> page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
>
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't
> the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't
> like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's
> eyes.
no it wasnt KR needs to get a sense of humour
Longy:0) wrote:
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's eyes.
> mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
> Longy:0)
> wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again he
> can't take a joke,
> go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a page to prove me
> wrong go
> now, go on
here
> again he
> brings weiner into it
>
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't the
> same. it may be funny
> for you but for those involved, we don't like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
no but it is a serious accusation in SR's eyes.
i think KR needs to lightend up a bit
mandatare wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again he
> can't take a joke, go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a page to prove me
> wrong go now, go on
here
> again he
> brings weiner into it
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't the
> same. it may be funny for you but for those involved, we don't like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
> Longy:0) wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
> Longy:0) wrote:
> No it's KR
> being a Weiner again he
> can't take a joke, go
> on KR go back and
> find
> a page to prove me
> wrong go now, go on
here
> again he
> brings weiner into it
> again
exactly
isn't it obvious we aern't the
> same. it may be funny for you but for those involved, we don't like it.
it wasn't exactly bad
Longy you are in the SR mag in the club pages
Page: