The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> Jelly on a plate
Jelly on a plate
Wibble wobble
Wibble wobble
Jelly on a
> plate
Thats made my day :)
> Jelly on a plate
Jelly on a plate
Wibble wobble
Wibble wobble
Jelly on a
> plate
Thats made my day :)
Jelly on a plate
Jelly on a plate
Wibble wobble
Wibble wobble
Jelly on a plate
Jelly on a plate
Wibble wobble
Wibble wobble
Jelly on a plate
Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër
> wrote:
> i know Natbuc supports
> them, but not you as
> well Pro
> Evo, god no!:O
he's a Sheff WED
> suppoter
*phew* There are already
> to many spurs supporters in the world.
do u have MSN?
---
yes i do
> §pånkër wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër
> wrote:
> i know Natbuc supports
> them, but not you as
> well Pro
> Evo, god no!:O
he's a Sheff WED
> suppoter
*phew* There are already
> to many spurs supporters in the world.
do u have MSN?
---
yes i do
sPiKe2k wrote:
> afternoon everyone, hows it goin?
Hi...fine thanks.
> afternoon everyone, hows it goin?
Hi...fine thanks.
Pro Evo wrote:
> I just dont go on during the day really.
Ok
> I just dont go on during the day really.
Ok
I just dont go on during the day really.
afternoon everyone, hows it goin?
Pro Evo wrote:
> Yes i am a Sheff Wed supporter, the only one on SR me thinks. :D
my MSN is
> [email protected]
Im not on at the moment though.
why not?
> Yes i am a Sheff Wed supporter, the only one on SR me thinks. :D
my MSN is
> [email protected]
Im not on at the moment though.
why not?
Yes i am a Sheff Wed supporter, the only one on SR me thinks. :D
my MSN is [email protected]
Im not on at the moment though.
my MSN is [email protected]
Im not on at the moment though.
§pånkër wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> i know Natbuc supports
> them, but not you as
> well Pro Evo, god no!:O
he's a Sheff WED
> suppoter
*phew* There are already to many spurs supporters in the world.
do u have MSN?
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> i know Natbuc supports
> them, but not you as
> well Pro Evo, god no!:O
he's a Sheff WED
> suppoter
*phew* There are already to many spurs supporters in the world.
do u have MSN?
Page: