The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
I haven't voted yet, maybe I should go now and do it.
Good, why should someone be made notable just because Tony thinks so, surely it is our votes that count.
I reckon that Your Honour will be the only notable voted on this time, have you seen the amount of votes hes had?
Tony's Head....
_______________
Part 1: lSPACE FOR RENTl
Part 2: Please refer to Part 1
Part 3: I can't count this high???!!!???
_______________
Part 1: lSPACE FOR RENTl
Part 2: Please refer to Part 1
Part 3: I can't count this high???!!!???
Meka said that Tony didn't want more than one notable this time.... and I think he proved that by saying that he didn't want Turbo, who he voted as a notable anyway.
Strange.
Strange.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Who else thinks there will be more than one notable elected?
last year the margin was about 2.3 votes. this time, it's abouyt 10, so unless Stryke gets a lot, or i do for that matter (^u^) i don't think there will be more than one.
> Who else thinks there will be more than one notable elected?
last year the margin was about 2.3 votes. this time, it's abouyt 10, so unless Stryke gets a lot, or i do for that matter (^u^) i don't think there will be more than one.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Who else thinks there will be more than one notable elected?
last year the margin was about 2.3 votes. this time, it's abouyt 10, so unless Stryke gets a lot, or i do for that matter (^u^) i don't think there will be more than one.
> Who else thinks there will be more than one notable elected?
last year the margin was about 2.3 votes. this time, it's abouyt 10, so unless Stryke gets a lot, or i do for that matter (^u^) i don't think there will be more than one.
Dunno? i'm guessin he's newbie anyway, which makes it invalid.
Plus, the other day i found out that Goatboy loves all my topics, even though I had not seen him reply to one of them.
Plus, the other day i found out that Goatboy loves all my topics, even though I had not seen him reply to one of them.
Pro Evo wrote:
> I got 3 votes so far, and one from Samos.
No offence if you read but i havent
> really seen him/her about, does he post here much?
-----
I've never seen them.... still, a vote is a vote. And 3 is better. Well done!
> I got 3 votes so far, and one from Samos.
No offence if you read but i havent
> really seen him/her about, does he post here much?
-----
I've never seen them.... still, a vote is a vote. And 3 is better. Well done!
Who else thinks there will be more than one notable elected?
Page: