The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
thats a record for after school for me.
Ive already done almost 70 posts today!
§pånkër wrote:
> I cant wit for Soul Calibur 2!
is it coming out on ps2?
> I cant wit for Soul Calibur 2!
is it coming out on ps2?
§pånkër wrote:
> im stretching away from stryke again!! Phew.
think you can catch MOJO by tonight?
> im stretching away from stryke again!! Phew.
think you can catch MOJO by tonight?
I cant wit for Soul Calibur 2!
Soul Calibur was a quality game, it was about 10 times faster than tekken tag.
§pånkër wrote:
> tekken tag was a disappointment for me, it was to slow.
yeah, i prefer one on ones rather than tag teaming.
can't wait for tekken 4 though.
> tekken tag was a disappointment for me, it was to slow.
yeah, i prefer one on ones rather than tag teaming.
can't wait for tekken 4 though.
im stretching away from stryke again!! Phew.
TOP 30 POSTERS FROM LAST 30 DAYS
1 Kid Rock 2832 88864
2 AfroJoe 1399 71795
3 MoJoJoJo 1175 87921
4 §pånkër 1083 35834
5 Stryke 1073 90876
6 Mystique 928 25007
7 Na†ßu© 834 29956
8 Solskjær_24 786 69668
9 Pro Evo 767 46643
10 Grix Thraves 719 39361
11 $h@ne0 716 78663
12 Your Honour 668 47275
13 Or†ega 629 30413
14 Asher D 620 21927
15 allardini 610 36716
16 RM18 584 48003
17 Doughnut Monster 577 32036
18 Ant 560 63468
19 er-no 556 36217
20 Edgy 539 40826
21 Meka Dragon 531 41807
22 TomUK 529 25767
23 Turbonutter 515 26857
24 mandatare 515 17041
25 ===SONICRAV---> 509 50394
26 Shadow 491 13918
27 WòókieeMøn§†€® 473 38252
28 Goatboy 471 46329
29 Jimmy Duck 468 9143
30 Longy:0) 459 14670
1 Kid Rock 2832 88864
2 AfroJoe 1399 71795
3 MoJoJoJo 1175 87921
4 §pånkër 1083 35834
5 Stryke 1073 90876
6 Mystique 928 25007
7 Na†ßu© 834 29956
8 Solskjær_24 786 69668
9 Pro Evo 767 46643
10 Grix Thraves 719 39361
11 $h@ne0 716 78663
12 Your Honour 668 47275
13 Or†ega 629 30413
14 Asher D 620 21927
15 allardini 610 36716
16 RM18 584 48003
17 Doughnut Monster 577 32036
18 Ant 560 63468
19 er-no 556 36217
20 Edgy 539 40826
21 Meka Dragon 531 41807
22 TomUK 529 25767
23 Turbonutter 515 26857
24 mandatare 515 17041
25 ===SONICRAV---> 509 50394
26 Shadow 491 13918
27 WòókieeMøn§†€® 473 38252
28 Goatboy 471 46329
29 Jimmy Duck 468 9143
30 Longy:0) 459 14670
tekken tag was a disappointment for me, it was to slow.
Page: