The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
(I don’t know you tell me)
Shut up you! Anyway we give many a reason why we say one is better than the other is the differences between the Nintendo and Sony games.
(Yeah Playstation games rule and Nintendo’s well don’t)
Erm ok. The games play differently. Playstation games are more serious, Adult (not mature) and realistic and Nintendo’s are more well fun!
(Are you saying the Playstation isn’t fun?)
No you see Nintendo tends to break the rules of game creating a bit. If Sony was making a Tennis game they would make a game in the style of Virtual Tennis but Nintendo make a brilliant Tennis game that is very different to a normal Tennis game a.k.a Mario Tennis. Mario Tennis is a pure laugh, hit your opponents, the ring shot mode, Luigi crying it is gaming brilliance and good fun but that’s because Nintendo have no restrictions if they believe there should be a court with weapons and it shakes with Lava underneath they will make one but Sony will try sticking to the rules.
(Sony has “fun” “unrealistic” games as well!)
Perfect true but nowhere near as much! It is a breath of fresh air when the Playstation gets something different i.e. WWF Smackdown 2. It is insane fun! But if you get thrown of a Hell in the cell you get straight back up? Not even the actual WWF do that! But it bends the rules and it is fun to play! It works the same with Nintendo when we get an Adult or realistic title such as Perfect Dark or Resident Evil 2 we go mad because it is something new! Pikmin will be great but I am looking more forward to Eternal Darkness, as it is something I am not as used to!
(So what you are saying is that Sony’s games are sticking to the rules of life with the Adult and realistic titles but Nintendo break them and make there own rules such as why should an RPG be like this or why does Football have to obey by rules? Why can’t we pelt them with shells? Nintendo is unrealistic and it isn’t an accident it is so games can do more! Sony on the other hand have realistic fun games, they are enjoyable and more believable like it is real! They don’t have paper characters moving around a 3D world.)
Exactly and the reason why I prefer Nintendo over Sony is because the insane games designed by the Big N are games are prefer to realistic games!
(And I prefer Sony because games that feel more real are more enjoyable as I honestly believe I can be having this fun!)
Exactly!
(Yeah I think I agree!)
No were not supposed to agree!
(Oh yeah…)
BOOM
Dringo
> TBN isn't biased then? :)
Not any more than anyone else. A lot of people are imadvertantly biased because they have been fed false information and refuse to accept it's not true.
Sony and Nintendo have differences which is why they sell differently, Sony (well their 3rd parties) stick with Realism as their fans prefer it. Nintendo tehnopposite.
Yes Gameplay, sound, graphics all imprtant but it is the games styles that differ the two!
> Ridge Racer 64 and Wipeout 64 are PSone games so they don't
> count.
Now, you have succeeded in naming 6. Off the top of my
> head I reckon I could name 30, and is I dig out an old magazing I
> could probably manage twice that. Dringo, this is a losing battle.
I know i am especially as if i win the argument i go against my topic! And why does it being on Sony as well make it invalid ah? I would say they are racingg ames on the 64!
But hey i prefer fun racers and stuff a.k.a Mario Kart, Diddy Kong Racing, Snowboard kids 1,2, Wipeout, Star wars racer, V Rally, rush 2059 and many many more!
This is why i prefer Nintendo's unrealistic games to playstations realism and this is why i wrote the post!
Dringo