The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Post in the game you would like to get in March, mines:
SOCOM II
Peace to u all...
SOCOM II
Peace to u all...
Page:
Cyclone wrote:
>
> No way is it. The headset is a nice idea but utterly useless in terms
> of any real impact on gameplay, the levels 'feel' like a sandbox that
> you have been put in at one end and must struggle out the other,
Really? How many levels have you 'struggled' through exactly?
the
> AI is absoloutely appalling,
Uh not really.
the mission objectives the same - since
> when do you actually do anything except shoot idiotic terrorists?
Defuse bombs, rescue hostages...
> Normally FPS games do this with style and fun, but RS3 falls flat on
> it's face in that respect.
>
> Never played Live, might be better, but despite looking/sounding
> nice, RS3 is devoid of any real atmosphere and fun because the levels
> are so pap.
Never played live? Shame really since just about every aspect of RS3 can be played online, including the missions.
Offline you've really only got about 20-25% of the game.
>
> No way is it. The headset is a nice idea but utterly useless in terms
> of any real impact on gameplay, the levels 'feel' like a sandbox that
> you have been put in at one end and must struggle out the other,
Really? How many levels have you 'struggled' through exactly?
the
> AI is absoloutely appalling,
Uh not really.
the mission objectives the same - since
> when do you actually do anything except shoot idiotic terrorists?
Defuse bombs, rescue hostages...
> Normally FPS games do this with style and fun, but RS3 falls flat on
> it's face in that respect.
>
> Never played Live, might be better, but despite looking/sounding
> nice, RS3 is devoid of any real atmosphere and fun because the levels
> are so pap.
Never played live? Shame really since just about every aspect of RS3 can be played online, including the missions.
Offline you've really only got about 20-25% of the game.
Cyclone wrote:
>
> Half Life 2 any FPS this year
If it lacks Live then it'll be behind Doom3 and Halo 2 for me.
>
> Half Life 2 any FPS this year
If it lacks Live then it'll be behind Doom3 and Halo 2 for me.
I've got three must-buys on my list for March:
James Bond 007: Everything or Nothing
Champions of Norrath
Driv3r
Four if FFX-2 slips a couple of weeks.
James Bond 007: Everything or Nothing
Champions of Norrath
Driv3r
Four if FFX-2 slips a couple of weeks.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Yes thats why sp many people rave about it and enjoy playing it. Maybe
> the earlier PC versions had faults but the Xbox version is brilliant.
Well, my Xbox version must have a fault, because the single player sucks.
And I meant MP2 as an Acture/Adventure thing, obviously.
> Yes thats why sp many people rave about it and enjoy playing it. Maybe
> the earlier PC versions had faults but the Xbox version is brilliant.
Well, my Xbox version must have a fault, because the single player sucks.
And I meant MP2 as an Acture/Adventure thing, obviously.
Cyclone wrote:
> *Metroid Prime 2 will not count.
Its to be hoped not, as a FPS its below any of the top competition. As an Action/Adventure game is where it excels.
> *Metroid Prime 2 will not count.
Its to be hoped not, as a FPS its below any of the top competition. As an Action/Adventure game is where it excels.
Yes thats why sp many people rave about it and enjoy playing it. Maybe the earlier PC versions had faults but the Xbox version is brilliant.
Resident Evil 4 would get my money over Halo 2 anyday, but they are very different games.
Annnddd..
Half Life 2 > any FPS this year*
*Metroid Prime 2 will not count.
Annnddd..
Half Life 2 > any FPS this year*
*Metroid Prime 2 will not count.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> The single player on Rainbow Six 3 is utterly rubbish? Thats absolute
> anal talk. The single player is sweet, probably one of the best games
> on the Xbox providing you have a head set.
No way is it. The headset is a nice idea but utterly useless in terms of any real impact on gameplay, the levels 'feel' like a sandbox that you have been put in at one end and must struggle out the other, the AI is absoloutely appalling, the mission objectives the same - since when do you actually do anything except shoot idiotic terrorists? Normally FPS games do this with style and fun, but RS3 falls flat on it's face in that respect.
Never played Live, might be better, but despite looking/sounding nice, RS3 is devoid of any real atmosphere and fun because the levels are so pap.
> The single player on Rainbow Six 3 is utterly rubbish? Thats absolute
> anal talk. The single player is sweet, probably one of the best games
> on the Xbox providing you have a head set.
No way is it. The headset is a nice idea but utterly useless in terms of any real impact on gameplay, the levels 'feel' like a sandbox that you have been put in at one end and must struggle out the other, the AI is absoloutely appalling, the mission objectives the same - since when do you actually do anything except shoot idiotic terrorists? Normally FPS games do this with style and fun, but RS3 falls flat on it's face in that respect.
Never played Live, might be better, but despite looking/sounding nice, RS3 is devoid of any real atmosphere and fun because the levels are so pap.
Couldn't care less.
Shows how much you know about it then.
Page: