The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Capcom on Devil May Cry:
"I haven't been able to study other hardware, so I can't say specifically. I would say the game would look prettier on Xbox. As for Gamecube, I have a feeling it isn't the right kind of game for this platform."
Good idea Turbonutter get behind that chair I suggest the rest of you join him...
WHAT!!!! Capcom, no, please!
Nintendo are making them selves seem more adult look at Eternal Darkness. I am hurt and disappointed, I thought Devil May Cry looked excellent, it's not that it might not come out on it; no it's the reason why it might not.
Hmmm what could he mean? Wouldn't look right, I WONDER!
Why not Capcom? Your bringing Resident Evil 0 and 4? Are you scared of Eternal Darkness or something? I am gutted as Nintendo have tried so hard to change their image to sop those sought of comments.
Look at Luigi's Mansion, sure it is still cute but the storyline isn't lets go to a castle in the sky to rescue a Princess, instead it's rid a mansion of ghosts! And with Luigi's new jeans I’d say it is much more older looking than the previous Mario and Luigi games.
Eternal Darkness and Too Human are Nintendo's first in house horror games as well and with Perfect Dark 0 and Conker 2 still to come I’d say Devil May Cry would fit perfectly.
So there you have it! Everything many others and I had tried to do to prove Nintendo isn't the kiddie console it has been labeled ripped up and we are forced to start again.
Dringo
"I haven't been able to study other hardware, so I can't say specifically. I would say the game would look prettier on Xbox. As for Gamecube, I have a feeling it isn't the right kind of game for this platform."
Good idea Turbonutter get behind that chair I suggest the rest of you join him...
WHAT!!!! Capcom, no, please!
Nintendo are making them selves seem more adult look at Eternal Darkness. I am hurt and disappointed, I thought Devil May Cry looked excellent, it's not that it might not come out on it; no it's the reason why it might not.
Hmmm what could he mean? Wouldn't look right, I WONDER!
Why not Capcom? Your bringing Resident Evil 0 and 4? Are you scared of Eternal Darkness or something? I am gutted as Nintendo have tried so hard to change their image to sop those sought of comments.
Look at Luigi's Mansion, sure it is still cute but the storyline isn't lets go to a castle in the sky to rescue a Princess, instead it's rid a mansion of ghosts! And with Luigi's new jeans I’d say it is much more older looking than the previous Mario and Luigi games.
Eternal Darkness and Too Human are Nintendo's first in house horror games as well and with Perfect Dark 0 and Conker 2 still to come I’d say Devil May Cry would fit perfectly.
So there you have it! Everything many others and I had tried to do to prove Nintendo isn't the kiddie console it has been labeled ripped up and we are forced to start again.
Dringo
Page:
NINTENDO = GAMEPLAY
Turbonutter wrote:
> Anyway, I've had enough of this for now. Nintendo is less mature
> than Sony and nothing will ever change that.
Thank you, and
> goodnight-tah.
Sigh as i see looks are everything, if it looks realistic or looks violent it is therefore more mature?
Nintendo know looks mean nothing, they tried proving that with Conker, it looks cute but it aint!
We do not disagree with the fact it has a Kiddie "IMAGE" as people think "AHA, Nintendo = kids", but they are wrong as under that cute exterior is a well put together game enjoyable by all ages and are more mature than games that have blood spurting left right and centre.
Nintendo and their fans know this, all Nintendo need to do now is make people actually see that Nintendo aren't just made for kids and is a mature console even more so than Sony as their fans laugh at a man's head falling off. Is this maturity? Or a Teenage thrill?
As Nintendo plow on with their very own horror department in the form of Silicon Knights to help change this image, I hope one day you might come to understand that it is what is inside that counts.
Dringo-signing off
> Anyway, I've had enough of this for now. Nintendo is less mature
> than Sony and nothing will ever change that.
Thank you, and
> goodnight-tah.
Sigh as i see looks are everything, if it looks realistic or looks violent it is therefore more mature?
Nintendo know looks mean nothing, they tried proving that with Conker, it looks cute but it aint!
We do not disagree with the fact it has a Kiddie "IMAGE" as people think "AHA, Nintendo = kids", but they are wrong as under that cute exterior is a well put together game enjoyable by all ages and are more mature than games that have blood spurting left right and centre.
Nintendo and their fans know this, all Nintendo need to do now is make people actually see that Nintendo aren't just made for kids and is a mature console even more so than Sony as their fans laugh at a man's head falling off. Is this maturity? Or a Teenage thrill?
As Nintendo plow on with their very own horror department in the form of Silicon Knights to help change this image, I hope one day you might come to understand that it is what is inside that counts.
Dringo-signing off
Kellogs, hi Nintendo will give you 2 milllion if you let us make a cereal with Pikachu on it?
Nintedo: Ok
Cabarys: Hi Ninty can we do the same with chocolate
Nintendo: (Laughting) sure
CLoaths manufactureer: High Ninty will give you 1 million to make Pikachu cloaths?
Nitendo: Why not?
I think you get the point?
Nintendo didn't milk the craze other companies did!
Nintedo: Ok
Cabarys: Hi Ninty can we do the same with chocolate
Nintendo: (Laughting) sure
CLoaths manufactureer: High Ninty will give you 1 million to make Pikachu cloaths?
Nitendo: Why not?
I think you get the point?
Nintendo didn't milk the craze other companies did!
Anyway, I've had enough of this for now. Nintendo is less mature than Sony and nothing will ever change that.
Thank you, and goodnight-tah.
Thank you, and goodnight-tah.
u cant blame nintedo for that in a bad way. Kids will buy anything with the word pokemon prited on it. it makes the kids happy and it makes more money for nintendo. they can invest more in making better games...everybodys happy!
Or†ega wrote:
> taking final fantasy to the 10th+ game is not milking it then?
URGH? Trading crads, cuddly toys, easter eggs, merchendise, keyrings, lunch boxes, candy? Just about everything you can print a yellow mouse onto has a Pokémon label!
> taking final fantasy to the 10th+ game is not milking it then?
URGH? Trading crads, cuddly toys, easter eggs, merchendise, keyrings, lunch boxes, candy? Just about everything you can print a yellow mouse onto has a Pokémon label!
Or†ega wrote:
> taking final fantasy to the 10th+ game is not milking it then?
Very good point. and he just admitted Pokemon aint childish past the shell! YAY!
> taking final fantasy to the 10th+ game is not milking it then?
Very good point. and he just admitted Pokemon aint childish past the shell! YAY!
I loved all Pokemon games out in the UK! They are selling more and more all the time and the taste in games vary so there is no point in arguing that it is better than final fantasy!
Or†ega wrote:
> its just the shell the game is in. it would still be the same game
> if the characters were replaced with somthing out of resi evil or
> whatever.
OK, I agree that deep down in the core of the game, with all the level raising and fighting and so on, pokemon isn't a childish game. Everything about the way its presented, all the characters and places and sounds, are childish. This makes it a childish game.
> its just the shell the game is in. it would still be the same game
> if the characters were replaced with somthing out of resi evil or
> whatever.
OK, I agree that deep down in the core of the game, with all the level raising and fighting and so on, pokemon isn't a childish game. Everything about the way its presented, all the characters and places and sounds, are childish. This makes it a childish game.
taking final fantasy to the 10th+ game is not milking it then?
Page: