The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
any one have it?if so tell me what you think abuot it.
Page:
Not anymore.
metaloverlord wrote:
> this is a pretty good chatroom:O
No thanks to you. You're turning it into a cross between Idiots Anonymous and a Hillbilly disco.
> this is a pretty good chatroom:O
No thanks to you. You're turning it into a cross between Idiots Anonymous and a Hillbilly disco.
Lipe wrote:
> Hm, OK, I got Bob's explanation but GP's made me confused again :(
It's best not to listen to me as I make as much sense as a Chinese video instruction manual.
> Hm, OK, I got Bob's explanation but GP's made me confused again :(
It's best not to listen to me as I make as much sense as a Chinese video instruction manual.
And I'm just as bad.
I doubt the stuff I say is easy to understand either. I write things as they occur to me, and while that makes sense in my head it doesn't always work out well on paper. And I don't think using full stops either so I seem to use (or at least used to) about 12 commas instead.
I take ages to explain things. 1500 word English coursework essays easily become 2500 words with me.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Not so much terrible, more outdated. R wasn't that good: Far too
> easy, and very thin on content. I found 3D to be pretty damn good,
> however, and very playable.
I thought they where both awful games. Sonic R was a confusing mess, terrible level design coupled with some truly diabolical graphics, and from what I remember pitiful amount of tracks on offer. Sonic 3D was again, rubbish, the isometric camera turned the game into just another run of the mill platform game.
Sonic was always about speed, but in Sonic 3D that was lost in favour of some monotonous creature bashing and ring collecting nonsense. Of course that was exactly what you had to do in the original sonic games, but the speed of the game was worthy compensation.
> Not so much terrible, more outdated. R wasn't that good: Far too
> easy, and very thin on content. I found 3D to be pretty damn good,
> however, and very playable.
I thought they where both awful games. Sonic R was a confusing mess, terrible level design coupled with some truly diabolical graphics, and from what I remember pitiful amount of tracks on offer. Sonic 3D was again, rubbish, the isometric camera turned the game into just another run of the mill platform game.
Sonic was always about speed, but in Sonic 3D that was lost in favour of some monotonous creature bashing and ring collecting nonsense. Of course that was exactly what you had to do in the original sonic games, but the speed of the game was worthy compensation.
try the new ones.i think there cool!
I really didn't like the demo of the new Sonic games, it just doesn't have the same sense of speed and has bloody annoying camera to contend with.
Yeah, the new ones are just average games...nothing special really.
Page: