Viewing Thread:
"sonicCD"

any one have it?if so tell me what you think abuot it.

Der Nazi wrote:
> Not so much terrible, more outdated. R wasn't that good: Far too
> easy, and very thin on content. I found 3D to be pretty damn good,
> however, and very playable.

I thought they where both awful games. Sonic R was a confusing mess, terrible level design coupled with some truly diabolical graphics, and from what I remember pitiful amount of tracks on offer. Sonic 3D was again, rubbish, the isometric camera turned the game into just another run of the mill platform game.

Sonic was always about speed, but in Sonic 3D that was lost in favour of some monotonous creature bashing and ring collecting nonsense. Of course that was exactly what you had to do in the original sonic games, but the speed of the game was worthy compensation.

I take ages to explain things. 1500 word English coursework essays easily become 2500 words with me.

I doubt the stuff I say is easy to understand either. I write things as they occur to me, and while that makes sense in my head it doesn't always work out well on paper. And I don't think using full stops either so I seem to use (or at least used to) about 12 commas instead.

And I'm just as bad.

Lipe wrote:
> Hm, OK, I got Bob's explanation but GP's made me confused again :(

It's best not to listen to me as I make as much sense as a Chinese video instruction manual.

metaloverlord wrote:
> this is a pretty good chatroom:O

No thanks to you. You're turning it into a cross between Idiots Anonymous and a Hillbilly disco.

Not anymore.

this is a pretty good chatroom:O

Oooooooh, OK, I got it now :) Hm, I think I've played games like that before.

Grandprix wrote:
> Hmmm, I think that needs some rephrasing.

Difficult isn't it?

But yes, that's what I'm trying to say.