The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I suppose theres been loads of them throughout the age. But this really sprang too mind because of the way it confirmed my suspicions. I might be wrong yes, but if you actually look at the evidence it adds up. The American Government are thinking of banning this i think, but because of it they've forced the American Government to release the Gas Station Pics where previously they refused. It is interesting so please make your own mind up about it and it would be interesting to hear your views. it is on for 1 hour and a half but trust me its worth it.
Twin Towers Theory
Twin Towers Theory
Page:
Well i haven't read the report, you obviously have. Im basing all of this on that video.
Seifer wrote:
> Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of
> the heat of the jet fuel. Especially a building that has been
> made to withstand these attacks.
It wasn't made to withstand it. The insulating foam that covered the girders was only made to withstand a normal fire, the jet fuel stripped it right off leaving exposed steel. You dont need to melt steel for it to be able to bend under stress.
> Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of
> the heat of the jet fuel. Especially a building that has been
> made to withstand these attacks.
It wasn't made to withstand it. The insulating foam that covered the girders was only made to withstand a normal fire, the jet fuel stripped it right off leaving exposed steel. You dont need to melt steel for it to be able to bend under stress.
Seifer wrote:
> Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of
> the heat of the jet fuel.
Ever read the official report? It makes no such claim. It suggests heat might have been a contributing factor to the structure (which was already under considerable stress) weakening further. Quite how we got to melting steel is beyond me.
> Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of
> the heat of the jet fuel.
Ever read the official report? It makes no such claim. It suggests heat might have been a contributing factor to the structure (which was already under considerable stress) weakening further. Quite how we got to melting steel is beyond me.
Garin wrote:
> Oh go on then....I'll bite.
>
> Somebody explain to me then what relevance the melting point of
> steel is.
Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of the heat of the jet fuel. Especially a building that has been made to withstand these attacks. Its just shrouded in mystery really.
> Oh go on then....I'll bite.
>
> Somebody explain to me then what relevance the melting point of
> steel is.
Basically theres no chance that it could of collapsed because of the heat of the jet fuel. Especially a building that has been made to withstand these attacks. Its just shrouded in mystery really.
Oh go on then....I'll bite.
Somebody explain to me then what relevance the melting point of steel is.
Somebody explain to me then what relevance the melting point of steel is.
Bullett wrote:
> Saying that though, there are some points raised which can't be
> just the imagination of a conspiracy theorist, like the melting
> point for the girders and the heat at which the fuel burns. The
> hole in the Pentagon was also interesting, but I won't get
> sucked in by anything.
The melting point is what had me too, and saying that you can see bits coming out the building before its goes down which do look like explosives. Im not saying its true not at all but i believe there are things there that got me thinking. Wouldn't harm the US Government to answer a few questions though would it?
> Saying that though, there are some points raised which can't be
> just the imagination of a conspiracy theorist, like the melting
> point for the girders and the heat at which the fuel burns. The
> hole in the Pentagon was also interesting, but I won't get
> sucked in by anything.
The melting point is what had me too, and saying that you can see bits coming out the building before its goes down which do look like explosives. Im not saying its true not at all but i believe there are things there that got me thinking. Wouldn't harm the US Government to answer a few questions though would it?
I'll be glad once Bush is gone, maybe then we can start putting some American dollars back into America and fixing stuff there instead of wasting billions. Let someone else deal with Iran
Kawada wrote:
> Gotten as boring as the constant Bush and Blair potshots really
> (and i'm by no means a fan of either)
Not for me ... they're the bullies of the world. Looks like Iran is next for the chopping board ...
> Gotten as boring as the constant Bush and Blair potshots really
> (and i'm by no means a fan of either)
Not for me ... they're the bullies of the world. Looks like Iran is next for the chopping board ...
Borat wrote:
> It's good to hear different theories and sides to the stories
> though ... the media hype would have us all believe Muslims are
> all fanatics and potential terrorists.
Don't know what media you read/watch but almost everything i ever see about the latest hoo ha is quickly followed by the standard *it is important to remember this is just a very small minority of muslims perverting Islam to their own ideals and that the vast majority of muslims are peaceful just like the religion itself* comment
Gotten as boring as the constant Bush and Blair potshots really (and i'm by no means a fan of either)
> It's good to hear different theories and sides to the stories
> though ... the media hype would have us all believe Muslims are
> all fanatics and potential terrorists.
Don't know what media you read/watch but almost everything i ever see about the latest hoo ha is quickly followed by the standard *it is important to remember this is just a very small minority of muslims perverting Islam to their own ideals and that the vast majority of muslims are peaceful just like the religion itself* comment
Gotten as boring as the constant Bush and Blair potshots really (and i'm by no means a fan of either)
Enjoyed watching that, cheers ...
I think there's a lot of truth in there, also a lot of hear-say and conjecture, a lot of theories that can't be proved or disproved. But then all good conspiracy theories are impossible to prove.
I don't know what I believe yet, I'm staying open minded about it all. Let's just say I don't trust George Bush and his cowboy administration, any more than I do Osama Bin Laden and his bunch of fanatical 'freedom' fighters.
I'm saddened that the world is run by that texas moron, there's no doubt that the events that took place that day have just given him more power to do as he pleases, not that that fact alone is enough to prove his guilt, just an observation.
It's good to hear different theories and sides to the stories though ... the media hype would have us all believe Muslims are all fanatics and potential terrorists, it's always great to see someone take a pop at Bush (and Blair).
I think there's a lot of truth in there, also a lot of hear-say and conjecture, a lot of theories that can't be proved or disproved. But then all good conspiracy theories are impossible to prove.
I don't know what I believe yet, I'm staying open minded about it all. Let's just say I don't trust George Bush and his cowboy administration, any more than I do Osama Bin Laden and his bunch of fanatical 'freedom' fighters.
I'm saddened that the world is run by that texas moron, there's no doubt that the events that took place that day have just given him more power to do as he pleases, not that that fact alone is enough to prove his guilt, just an observation.
It's good to hear different theories and sides to the stories though ... the media hype would have us all believe Muslims are all fanatics and potential terrorists, it's always great to see someone take a pop at Bush (and Blair).
Page: