The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Cyclone wrote:
> Didn't play it.
>
> Ridiculously over-rated.
>
> Riiiiight, would love to know how you came to that conclusion...
What?! 9.5 on Gamespot? 10/10 in Games TM?
> Was when I got it. 2 weeks later, I didn't play it.
Yep, exactly the same here. Loved it when I first got it, but the fun of crashing wore off quickly. Plus, I think it just doesn't work that well online, and that's not just because EA's servers suck balls. And the AI is exceptionally cheap.
> Didn't play it.
>
> Ridiculously over-rated.
Riiiiight, would love to know how you came to that conclusion...
Soon Fable too.
> I wouldn't call it rushed at all.
>
> It's one of the most complete and polished games I've played in a
> long time.
How can a game that crashes frequently and has a totally screwed up online mode be called polished? That's not even counting the other irks I have with it, like the DJ, like the unskippable intro, like having to set the language every time I put the game on, long loading times etc.
> Didn't play it.
>
> Ridiculously over-rated.
how very very true.
It's one of the most complete and polished games I've played in a long time.
It's not worth 30 quid it was part of the group of games rushed out before better games came along (same as SWB).
Plus EA have screwed up the online and paying full price for something like that just isn't right.
Will get it again later.