The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What's the integration of cos2x?
Page:
Hedfix wrote:
> J-42 wrote:
>
> What are you basing that on?
>
> Well.. banks, as I've already said.
It seemed like a general statement. "Banks" Which banks?
>
> >Sure, if you work in a certain industry
> that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a
> priority in the eyes of an employer.
>
> Yes and having a degree isn't always the best way. Apprentiships
> (sp?) and training at technical colleges etc can wield better results
> and actually get people the skills they need for work.
WHo's to say a university won't offer the same if not better results than a "technical college" why does the word "university" mean you can't gain similar skills to those of a technical college or apprenticship?
>
>
> I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two
> examples of things that may come from having a degree or
> qualification in maths or any subject.
>
> So you could have suggested 'getting beaten up' and 'a huge over
> draft' aswell then? :D
>
>
> I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
>
> Well I tried to give an example but you seem to have been unable to
> completely follow it.
You didn't mention "over qualified at all". You just said that banks want people fresh from their GCSEs.
>
>
> and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
>
> The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business
> is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for
> their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone
> lower down than them.
>
> 'Lower down than them' - exactly. So what happens if your
> degree/skills over-shadow people higher than you who are trying to
> just fill a position below them AND keep their job?
They're apllying for the wrong job. If the qualified person is apllyig for a different job altogether, why be threatened? Also, as you said before, experience is important too.
In some
> circumstances you won't get the job
I don't see the logic in not hiring someone because they're fully qualified. The person who is employing the apllicant has a job to emply the best person, so i'm sure they would fulfill this.
> J-42 wrote:
>
> What are you basing that on?
>
> Well.. banks, as I've already said.
It seemed like a general statement. "Banks" Which banks?
>
> >Sure, if you work in a certain industry
> that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a
> priority in the eyes of an employer.
>
> Yes and having a degree isn't always the best way. Apprentiships
> (sp?) and training at technical colleges etc can wield better results
> and actually get people the skills they need for work.
WHo's to say a university won't offer the same if not better results than a "technical college" why does the word "university" mean you can't gain similar skills to those of a technical college or apprenticship?
>
>
> I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two
> examples of things that may come from having a degree or
> qualification in maths or any subject.
>
> So you could have suggested 'getting beaten up' and 'a huge over
> draft' aswell then? :D
>
>
> I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
>
> Well I tried to give an example but you seem to have been unable to
> completely follow it.
You didn't mention "over qualified at all". You just said that banks want people fresh from their GCSEs.
>
>
> and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
>
> The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business
> is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for
> their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone
> lower down than them.
>
> 'Lower down than them' - exactly. So what happens if your
> degree/skills over-shadow people higher than you who are trying to
> just fill a position below them AND keep their job?
They're apllying for the wrong job. If the qualified person is apllyig for a different job altogether, why be threatened? Also, as you said before, experience is important too.
In some
> circumstances you won't get the job
I don't see the logic in not hiring someone because they're fully qualified. The person who is employing the apllicant has a job to emply the best person, so i'm sure they would fulfill this.
J-42 wrote:
>
> What are you basing that on?
Well.. banks, as I've already said.
>Sure, if you work in a certain industry
> that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a
> priority in the eyes of an employer.
Yes and having a degree isn't always the best way. Apprentiships (sp?) and training at technical colleges etc can wield better results and actually get people the skills they need for work.
> I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two
> examples of things that may come from having a degree or
> qualification in maths or any subject.
So you could have suggested 'getting beaten up' and 'a huge over draft' aswell then? :D
> I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
Well I tried to give an example but you seem to have been unable to completely follow it.
>
> and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
>
> The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business
> is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for
> their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone
> lower down than them.
'Lower down than them' - exactly. So what happens if your degree/skills over-shadow people higher than you who are trying to just fill a position below them AND keep their job? In some circumstances you won't get the job.
>
> What are you basing that on?
Well.. banks, as I've already said.
>Sure, if you work in a certain industry
> that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a
> priority in the eyes of an employer.
Yes and having a degree isn't always the best way. Apprentiships (sp?) and training at technical colleges etc can wield better results and actually get people the skills they need for work.
> I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two
> examples of things that may come from having a degree or
> qualification in maths or any subject.
So you could have suggested 'getting beaten up' and 'a huge over draft' aswell then? :D
> I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
Well I tried to give an example but you seem to have been unable to completely follow it.
>
> and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
>
> The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business
> is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for
> their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone
> lower down than them.
'Lower down than them' - exactly. So what happens if your degree/skills over-shadow people higher than you who are trying to just fill a position below them AND keep their job? In some circumstances you won't get the job.
Hedfix wrote:
> Actually certain places (like banks) want people straight from
> finishing their GCSE's and since a pretty high proportion of people
> graduate now having a degree is counting for less and less.
>
> Employers want people with experience that's applicable to situations
> and work in the real world.
What are you basing that on? Sure, if you work in a certain industry that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a priority in the eyes of an employer.
>
> And since when has a 'better' career and 'more money' been 100%
> linked?
I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two examples of things that may come from having a degree or qualification in maths or any subject.
>
> Also there is such a thing as being over-qualified
I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone lower down than them.
> Actually certain places (like banks) want people straight from
> finishing their GCSE's and since a pretty high proportion of people
> graduate now having a degree is counting for less and less.
>
> Employers want people with experience that's applicable to situations
> and work in the real world.
What are you basing that on? Sure, if you work in a certain industry that may be true, but in most specialised jobs being qualified is a priority in the eyes of an employer.
>
> And since when has a 'better' career and 'more money' been 100%
> linked?
I didn't say that. I didn't say they were linked at all. I gave two examples of things that may come from having a degree or qualification in maths or any subject.
>
> Also there is such a thing as being over-qualified
I haven't heard of this. Please explain.
and funnily enough
> the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more
> qualified to do their job than they are.
The only way I thijnk of that situation is if an owner of a business is looking for a partner, in which case they would want the best for their business. In any other case, an employer will emply someone lower down than them.
You're not disputing any.
Like GCSEs?
(I'm not disputing the other points :P)
(I'm not disputing the other points :P)
Actually certain places (like banks) want people straight from finishing their GCSE's and since a pretty high proportion of people graduate now having a degree is counting for less and less.
Employers want people with experience that's applicable to situations and work in the real world.
And since when has a 'better' career and 'more money' been 100% linked?
Also there is such a thing as being over-qualified and funnily enough the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more qualified to do their job than they are.
Employers want people with experience that's applicable to situations and work in the real world.
And since when has a 'better' career and 'more money' been 100% linked?
Also there is such a thing as being over-qualified and funnily enough the people doing the hiring can feel threatened if you're more qualified to do their job than they are.
It's not just A-Level, it's Higher as well.
gamesfreak wrote:
> I can't remember learning "integration" in GCSE maths.
>
> Mind you, I was in the class below the "highest" group.
That's because it's A-Level Maths.
-------------
(In reply to Hedfix's statemant about it being pointless)
It's not necessarily about it being useful in everyday life, if you learn about integration and pass your A-level Maths, you have a bigger chance of getting into a decent university. This leads to a better career and more money etc. Th
That is why.
> I can't remember learning "integration" in GCSE maths.
>
> Mind you, I was in the class below the "highest" group.
That's because it's A-Level Maths.
-------------
(In reply to Hedfix's statemant about it being pointless)
It's not necessarily about it being useful in everyday life, if you learn about integration and pass your A-level Maths, you have a bigger chance of getting into a decent university. This leads to a better career and more money etc. Th
That is why.
Integration was in Higher last year, how long ago did you do it m_m?
The answer is:
1/2(x + (sin2x/2)) + C
1/2(x + (sin2x/2)) + C
Page: