GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"communism"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Tue 04/10/05 at 20:01
Regular
Posts: 5
was marx right? will the proletariat really rise up and overthrow the bourgoisie or did he get it horribly wrong? discuss.
Tue 04/10/05 at 22:15
Regular
Posts: 5
Communism is basically the endless "ideal" world that Karl Marx believed would be created after the Proletarian (or lower class) revolution. It would follow on from the capitalist stage, where the Bourgoisie, or middle class would rule, which would itself have followed on from the monarchical initial stage. Marx was quite clear about how the world would get to this stage, but didnt really think the communist stage through, as he thought that people would just rule themselves and there would be no money because everyone was equal. He saw the whole of human history as a class stuggle, which the Proletariat would eventually win. As it has been said many times, its a nice idea, but pretty much doomed to fail.
Tue 04/10/05 at 21:23
Regular
Posts: 2,207
Can someone actually give me a full explaination of communism? I know it's the whole do everything get paid equally but i'm sure there's much more to it than that, otherwise it's obvious why it wouldn't work from the beginning.
Tue 04/10/05 at 21:14
Regular
"Not a Jew"
Posts: 7,532
If you don't like it you don't have to come in and read it.
Tue 04/10/05 at 21:07
Regular
"The definitive tag"
Posts: 3,752
I've got three and a half hours of sociology tomorrow afternoon, I don't need it here as well.

It's a big pile of ass, but it's easy.
Tue 04/10/05 at 21:00
Regular
"Not a Jew"
Posts: 7,532
Yeah, I'd have to agree with that. Communism is after all sound in theory but poor in practise. I disagree with many of Darwins theories (and consequently don't bother with) so I can't really contribute much to that side of things.
Tue 04/10/05 at 20:49
Regular
Posts: 5
I'm thinking of the French revolution here, as after there was the initial revolt, within a few years the revolutonary spirit had kind of dried up, leaving a space open for Napoeleon to come to power as emperor, so in effect a type of monarchy. Different situation i know, but i'm just drawing a similiarity to show the likely course of events. In relation to your point on "after so long", because i feel that the communist stage would be far shorter than both the capitalist and monarchical stage, possibly only lasting a decade if it wre a true communist society and not one like the USSR, which under Stalinist rule was, to all intents and purposes really a dictatorship. I personally, used to have resonably strong Communist beliefs, but having studied the Russian revolution in depth in history recently, i realise that Marx's view really missed out vital points. He had the method of getting to communism very well planned out, butonce it was at the stage, i feel he was unsure of what exactly would happen, and i fail to see how such a utopian society can be created, as surely it goes against the competitive laws of nature, which ironically, is exactly where Marx drew his ideas from, along with remnants of the free-thinking ideals of the French revolution itself. Surely social darwinism undermines itself is everyone truly is treated as equal?
Tue 04/10/05 at 20:30
Regular
"Not a Jew"
Posts: 7,532
Yes, but just including the capitalist phase doesn't mean you'll have a revolution. Also, people who for so long have been "equal" would have a hard time adapting to a monarchy system would they not? They'd probably be indoctrinated with so many communist beliefs that they'd revolt again shortly after the creation of a monarchy. I'm not saying it is impossible, just unlikely. Out of interest, what are your views on Communism? Would you join it if given the chance?
Tue 04/10/05 at 20:26
Regular
Posts: 5
yes, but think about how monarchies came about. In the beginning, all men were essentially equal, as they would be in the communist phase. However, one person, or group of people became rulers and initiated the monarchical system. Therefore, what is to say this wouln't happen in the communist society? Obviously, a revolution would never have happened in the USSR, but it could be argued that it wasnt a truly communist society, as the vital capitalist stage was missed out by lenin.
Tue 04/10/05 at 20:20
Regular
"Not a Jew"
Posts: 7,532
Well for one thing, revolution in a Communist country isn't very likely. Also, why would it revert back to a monarchy? Any royal "bloodlines" would be gone. More likely a democratic type government if even.
Tue 04/10/05 at 20:12
Regular
Posts: 5
What about if he only got half of it right, and an endless cycle will actually form, whereby at the communist stage, a monarch will arise and the whole class struggle will begin again.

ie.

Monarchy->Capitalism->communism v
^--------------------------------

rinse and repeat

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Wonderful...
... and so easy-to-use even for a technophobe like me. I had my website up in a couple of hours. Thank you.
Vivien
My website looks tremendous!
Fantastic site, easy to follow, simple guides... impressed with whole package. My website looks tremendous. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to set this up, Freeola helps you step-by-step.
Susan

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Close Feedback

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.