Viewing Thread:
"4-1"

Embarrassing.

Stryke wrote:
(e.g Oh, so Robbie Blake came to us? Do I like him?
> What do other people say?)

Blake? Pish. You'll be saying I like Cresswell and Moore next.

Healy and Hulse. The best strike force ever.

Don't know if you've had access to eyes recently Dringo but the Scottish league is, more often than not, won by one of two teams. And the Scottish title, to my knowledge, has never been decided by Christmas like you claim your oh-so-precious Premiership (which you just "glance at the results" for, now) to have been this season.

In conclusion - hush.

Stryke wrote:

>
> Don't you mean 2 dominate? Like 2 teams dominated the Premiership for
> 10 years?

So Newcastle, Arsenal, Liverpool, Blackburn and Manchester United are 2 teams. Great.


> Really?!?!
>
> We'll live.

But will the premiership. With falling attendance and TV revenue?

Ashman wrote:
> Don't know if you've had access to eyes recently Dringo but the
> Scottish league is, more often than not, won by one of two teams. And
> the Scottish title, to my knowledge, has never been decided by
> Christmas like you claim your oh-so-precious Premiership (which you
> just "glance at the results" for, now) to have been this
> season.

If Chelsea haven't won the premiership by February I'll be suprised.

Dringo wrote:
> The premiership, one team dominates.

I bet you said nothing when Arsenal went the whole season unbeaten.

Colourless wrote:
> Dringo wrote:
> The premiership, one team dominates.
>
> I bet you said nothing when Arsenal went the whole season unbeaten.

Actually I hated Arsenal too. Still do. But they did draw a load of games.

Dringo wrote:
> Stryke wrote:
>
>
> Don't you mean 2 dominate? Like 2 teams dominated the Premiership
> for
> 10 years?
>
> So Newcastle, Arsenal, Liverpool, Blackburn and Manchester United are
> 2 teams. Great.

--

Blackburn bought the title one year. Did Daddy Dringo hold you up and say "Spit bile, son, that's my lad"?

As for Liverpool, we've never threatened. Finished 2nd one year, wahey! Newcastle had a pop once, no-one ever thought they'd win.

So, no, you're wrong. It's been an Arsenal/Man Utd show for ages. But that was OK, and Chelsea isn't?

--

> But will the premiership. With falling attendance and TV revenue?

--

Ah, but you've had to pay all your money in fines for burning down stuff belonging to other people, so they'll be fine.

Dringo wrote:
> That's a good league. Rather interesting. And the BEST teams leave it
> every season... giving new teams a chance.
>
> Now there's an idea...

AhahahahhagahagahahahaaahhahahagHSghgashgahhahhaha

First of all, honestly now, tell me how many Leeds games you've been at this season. Because to be able to judge a league, you're going to pretty much need to see every team in it at least once. And how many Championship games have you watched, now?

Note, idiot: a league can't just be based on stats, results and the table like you seem to think it is.

Oh, and I like the way you imply the ludicrous suggestion that the winner of the Premiership be "promoted" somehow just so you can dismiss it when somebody tells you what a stupid comment somebody tells you it is.

Ashman wrote:

>
> First of all, honestly now, tell me how many Leeds games you've been
> at this season.

--

25! No, wait, that's not enough to be a die-hard. Where's my Leeds United store-bought calculator? 32! Yeah, 32 games!

I'm off to dinner.

Just the one (this season). And it was the 3-3 brighton game which was fun.

But I've been listening on Leeds radio and watching the highlights.

Still one team dominating the league is boring.

I'll grant you, a European super league is flawed... but if anyone can find a way to make it work... well... we'd have a very very very exciting league indeed.