The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4286294.stm[/URL]
Page:
I also mentioned a top pocket.
If you put it anywhere where it's likely to get bent then it's your own fault if it breaks.
If you put it anywhere where it's likely to get bent then it's your own fault if it breaks.
Hedfix wrote:
> "It was in my pocket and it broke"
>
> Well considering it's about 1mm thick I'm not surprised.
>
> Who would be so stupid as to put something expensive and flimsy like
> that in their trouser pocket? Top pocket maybe, but generally a bag
> of somesort makes the most sense.
>
> Christ people are stupid.
But..isn't that what these small devices are designed for?
If I'm going to have to carry an I-Pod around in a bag then I'd just get a normal sized one.
> "It was in my pocket and it broke"
>
> Well considering it's about 1mm thick I'm not surprised.
>
> Who would be so stupid as to put something expensive and flimsy like
> that in their trouser pocket? Top pocket maybe, but generally a bag
> of somesort makes the most sense.
>
> Christ people are stupid.
But..isn't that what these small devices are designed for?
If I'm going to have to carry an I-Pod around in a bag then I'd just get a normal sized one.
Thats what I said?
Morons are flinging them about like in the advert.
Morons are flinging them about like in the advert.
Ranma wrote:
> They said it was a flaw in only 1 in 10 of 1% of iPod Nanos sold and
> not a design flaw.
>
> Still I don't see why it should cost so much.
Why couldnt they just say 0.1%??? At least I think it's 0.1%...
> They said it was a flaw in only 1 in 10 of 1% of iPod Nanos sold and
> not a design flaw.
>
> Still I don't see why it should cost so much.
Why couldnt they just say 0.1%??? At least I think it's 0.1%...
They said it was a flaw in only 1 in 10 of 1% of iPod Nanos sold and not a design flaw.
Still I don't see why it should cost so much.
Still I don't see why it should cost so much.
Hedfix wrote:
> Christ people are stupid.
Especially when it comes to technology...
"What do you mean my brand new 3G phone with super-clear colour screen, built in camera and MP3 player will break if I drop it?"
> Christ people are stupid.
Especially when it comes to technology...
"What do you mean my brand new 3G phone with super-clear colour screen, built in camera and MP3 player will break if I drop it?"
"It was in my pocket and it broke"
Well considering it's about 1mm thick I'm not surprised.
Who would be so stupid as to put something expensive and flimsy like that in their trouser pocket? Top pocket maybe, but generally a bag of somesort makes the most sense.
Christ people are stupid.
Well considering it's about 1mm thick I'm not surprised.
Who would be so stupid as to put something expensive and flimsy like that in their trouser pocket? Top pocket maybe, but generally a bag of somesort makes the most sense.
Christ people are stupid.
I'd love to win a shuffle.
Umm, Lucy won a Shuffle as a result of a promotion in the call centre just before she left. Of course I did the decent thing and filled it up with my tunes so she doesn't want to use it.
It's actually pretty good. Would I consider spending money on one, or a proper iPod though? Probably not.
It's actually pretty good. Would I consider spending money on one, or a proper iPod though? Probably not.
Your Honour wrote:
> The whole iPod phenomenon is a complete victory for style and
> marketing over substance.
But...but...U2!
> The whole iPod phenomenon is a complete victory for style and
> marketing over substance.
But...but...U2!
Page: