The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I skipped school today and found myself enjoying life more. I went to Safeway and "bought" the Special Edition Gladiator and found myself pigging out at home and faking voices down the line to the school receptionist. How was your day?
Page:
Yet you can afford a DVD player? and the iternet?
You better not be spinning more lies ...
You better not be spinning more lies ...
J Nash wrote:
> “luxuries they deserve but can't afford” Eurgh. I bet you’re one of
> these families who go on GMTV complaining that they obviously don’t
> receive enough benefits because they can’t afford house hold brand
> names or Tvs in every room.
Meh. It's not my fault my Mum died and my Dad suffers from depression so he has trouble finding jobs because he is marked down as disabled.
So please don't insult me for trying to obtain items i see other kids owning who don't work s*** for.
Obviously my parents are both intelligent people or they wouldn't have had me. The moneymaker.
And no I am not looking for cheap sympathy.
> “luxuries they deserve but can't afford” Eurgh. I bet you’re one of
> these families who go on GMTV complaining that they obviously don’t
> receive enough benefits because they can’t afford house hold brand
> names or Tvs in every room.
Meh. It's not my fault my Mum died and my Dad suffers from depression so he has trouble finding jobs because he is marked down as disabled.
So please don't insult me for trying to obtain items i see other kids owning who don't work s*** for.
Obviously my parents are both intelligent people or they wouldn't have had me. The moneymaker.
And no I am not looking for cheap sympathy.
Alfonse wrote:
> Are you going to tell me why it is wrong?
To be honest I'd have thought it was obvious. Your family don't need the Gladiator special edition DVD. Also, it seems clear to me that you only took for your own please, not your family's.
If it's true that your family can't afford the DVD then I'm afraid that's just tough luck. I don't enough about your family to comment further but maybe your parents waste money on other things.
You can't just steal something because you want it. If everybody had that sort of attitude then there'd be complete chaos.
> Are you going to tell me why it is wrong?
To be honest I'd have thought it was obvious. Your family don't need the Gladiator special edition DVD. Also, it seems clear to me that you only took for your own please, not your family's.
If it's true that your family can't afford the DVD then I'm afraid that's just tough luck. I don't enough about your family to comment further but maybe your parents waste money on other things.
You can't just steal something because you want it. If everybody had that sort of attitude then there'd be complete chaos.
“luxuries they deserve but can't afford” Eurgh. I bet you’re one of these families who go on GMTV complaining that they obviously don’t receive enough benefits because they can’t afford house hold brand names or Tvs in every room.
JFH wrote:
> Alfonse wrote:
> I am a common thief and that is what you should refer to me as.
>
> ...
>
> Anyway why shouldn't I give my family luxuries they deserve but can't
> afford?
>
> So you stole Gladiator for your family? Right.
>
> If you were in complete poverty and you stole some bread then fair
> enough, stealing DVDs is just wrong.
Are you going to tell me why it is wrong?
> Alfonse wrote:
> I am a common thief and that is what you should refer to me as.
>
> ...
>
> Anyway why shouldn't I give my family luxuries they deserve but can't
> afford?
>
> So you stole Gladiator for your family? Right.
>
> If you were in complete poverty and you stole some bread then fair
> enough, stealing DVDs is just wrong.
Are you going to tell me why it is wrong?
Alfonse wrote:
> I am a common thief and that is what you should refer to me as.
...
> Anyway why shouldn't I give my family luxuries they deserve but can't afford?
So you stole Gladiator for your family? Right.
If you were in complete poverty and you stole some bread then fair enough, stealing DVDs is just wrong.
> I am a common thief and that is what you should refer to me as.
...
> Anyway why shouldn't I give my family luxuries they deserve but can't afford?
So you stole Gladiator for your family? Right.
If you were in complete poverty and you stole some bread then fair enough, stealing DVDs is just wrong.
Let me ask you something. What came first thieving or chavs? The answer is thieving and like I said before. I am a common thief and that is what you should refer to me as. Anyway why shouldn't I give my family luxuries they deserve but can't afford?
I'm talking about social habits, foo'. Fair enough it maybe pidgeon-holing slightly but when you display anger and Chav-ish traits then you are going to be considered one.
Talking about something like 'eating' is just childish, everybody eats and it was an over-the-top example. I get the point about not labelling you but that response was aw-spells-awful.
Talking about something like 'eating' is just childish, everybody eats and it was an over-the-top example. I get the point about not labelling you but that response was aw-spells-awful.
tnc wrote:
> Alfonse wrote:
>
> 1. I'm not a chav. And I am not a man. I am a boy.
>
> Um ... that was completely pointless (the second part) and as for
> being a Chav, well, that's Chav behaviour.
>
> 2. I never said I pranked anybody so please stop.
>
> 3. That was the conversation i had with the receptionist with the
> fake voices.
>
> The context in which you said it ("I'm cool and hard") made
> it sound like that and for most people pranking is pretending to be
> someone you're not (paedophilia excluded) doing it for fun is even
> more so.
She rung my house. I don't even know the number for the school.
EDIT: Chavs eat and you do it aswell so that means you are a chav?
> Alfonse wrote:
>
> 1. I'm not a chav. And I am not a man. I am a boy.
>
> Um ... that was completely pointless (the second part) and as for
> being a Chav, well, that's Chav behaviour.
>
> 2. I never said I pranked anybody so please stop.
>
> 3. That was the conversation i had with the receptionist with the
> fake voices.
>
> The context in which you said it ("I'm cool and hard") made
> it sound like that and for most people pranking is pretending to be
> someone you're not (paedophilia excluded) doing it for fun is even
> more so.
She rung my house. I don't even know the number for the school.
EDIT: Chavs eat and you do it aswell so that means you are a chav?
Alfonse wrote:
> 1. I'm not a chav. And I am not a man. I am a boy.
Um ... that was completely pointless (the second part) and as for being a Chav, well, that's Chav behaviour.
> 2. I never said I pranked anybody so please stop.
>
> 3. That was the conversation i had with the receptionist with the
> fake voices.
The context in which you said it ("I'm cool and hard") made it sound like that and for most people pranking is pretending to be someone you're not (paedophilia excluded) doing it for fun is even more so.
> 1. I'm not a chav. And I am not a man. I am a boy.
Um ... that was completely pointless (the second part) and as for being a Chav, well, that's Chav behaviour.
> 2. I never said I pranked anybody so please stop.
>
> 3. That was the conversation i had with the receptionist with the
> fake voices.
The context in which you said it ("I'm cool and hard") made it sound like that and for most people pranking is pretending to be someone you're not (paedophilia excluded) doing it for fun is even more so.
Page: