The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Thought we could do with a place.
First on the agenda, there will be no talk of Newcastle. Except, of course, the Jenas affair.
Why and where? They have Carrick and Davids in the centre, both of whom are pretty much irreplacable. Reid is good on the left, Routledge on the right. Besides, Jenas can't play there. Tell me why.
Oh, and Solano might be going to Newcastle too. Excellent news, if you ask me.
Keane to Everton? Robbie, that is.
First on the agenda, there will be no talk of Newcastle. Except, of course, the Jenas affair.
Why and where? They have Carrick and Davids in the centre, both of whom are pretty much irreplacable. Reid is good on the left, Routledge on the right. Besides, Jenas can't play there. Tell me why.
Oh, and Solano might be going to Newcastle too. Excellent news, if you ask me.
Keane to Everton? Robbie, that is.
Page:
nu·ga·to·ry
adj.
1. Of little or no importance; trifling
adj.
1. Of little or no importance; trifling
Woah woah woah. Apparently Tottenham signed Gregorz Rasiak?! That one slipped under the radar.
Yeah I read about that one yesterday, could be a decent signing! I haven;t seen much of him, but he has banged the goals in for Derby!
One to watch me thinks..also how many strikers do Spurs need?
One to watch me thinks..also how many strikers do Spurs need?
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> Thing is though, if a player wants to leave (and by all reports Nobby
> relished the chance to return to Newcastle) there really is no point
> in keeping him. You're better off with the money, no matter how
> nugatory, than with a player who doesn't want to be there.
True. But I would rather of had Milner on a straight swap, rather than 1.5 million and him on loan.
> Thing is though, if a player wants to leave (and by all reports Nobby
> relished the chance to return to Newcastle) there really is no point
> in keeping him. You're better off with the money, no matter how
> nugatory, than with a player who doesn't want to be there.
True. But I would rather of had Milner on a straight swap, rather than 1.5 million and him on loan.
therage79 wrote:
> One to watch me thinks..also how many strikers do Spurs need?
They currently have four. About the same as most clubs, really.
> One to watch me thinks..also how many strikers do Spurs need?
They currently have four. About the same as most clubs, really.
Indeed. It's more a case of how many midfielders do they need. Last time I counted there was 10.
Carrick, Davids, Brown, Mendes, Tainio, Reid, Routledge, Lennon, Jenas, Davis, Marney, Jackson. Are they all midfielders? Plus others like King and Stalteri can play in various midfield positions.
[URL]http://www.football365.com/news/story_161939.shtml[/URL]
Huh, I'm interested - it seems as if in the January window, yet again, they'll focus on youth. France looks to be churning out some brilliantly technical players, and South America has also always done so, though no doubt he'll bring in hundreds of spaniards.
Huh, I'm interested - it seems as if in the January window, yet again, they'll focus on youth. France looks to be churning out some brilliantly technical players, and South America has also always done so, though no doubt he'll bring in hundreds of spaniards.
Page: