The "PC Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Is it subscription based, like WoW?
Have they sorted out out that awful unwieldy menu system?
Does Xfire work with it yet?
Cheers
*hits regclean*
Back to the shop for you shoddy EA product.
> And for the life of me, I can't understand the argument about people
> on different hardware setups. As long as you're game runs smoothly
> there is no difference other than one has flashier graphics. The only
> thing that really gives the player the edge, if any, is surround
> sound. However, this applies to both 360 and PC.
Well for a start people running with better graphics will have better draw distances than the others. You only have to look at the screenshots Monkey Man has posted to work that one out.
Anyway, I'm not looking to get into a PC VS Console argument though. We'll just be retreading old ground that has been covered a million times before and still there will be no true winner or any point to the discussion. I'm just saying there's no reason why the 360 version won't be as good as the PC version.
Controls aren't a valid reason because everyone prefers different styles. Myself I'd rather shove a hot poker up my japseye than play with a keyboard and mouse.
Wont install patch though, "cannot find install folder".
Possibly because it crashed when registering with EA?
And NO I DONT WANT GAMESPY ARCADE, STOP ASKING ME
I foree a swift return to the shop for this
**edit**
How many patches are there for this?
I'm re-downloading v_102.exe but can't seem to see a v1?
Total Price : 1 soul
That's unusual....
/weary sarcasm
> I'm fairly positive that it
> will need more than 512.
That would be true if it worked like a PC, and if it were a PC, but it isn't. There's already been the example of HALO, and there are loads of ported console games that worked on consoles with 16MB of RAM and require 64MB or 256MB of RAM on the PC. What about Doom 3? How much RAM do you need for that on the PC? And how much does the Xbox have? Exactly!
> And how did me asking a couple of straight-forward, easy questions
> about Battlefield 2 turn into an argument about consoles vs PCs?
> Assclowns
=)
Azul mocked BF2 on 360, leading to a rather thoughtless comment from Tiltawhirl thus leading to a debate type thing.
You know how it is in this place =P
> Turok 2 on the N64 had MASSIVE levels, and that only had 4MB of RAM.
However it didn't have an awful lot of 'action' as it were happening over the entire level unlike BF2. I know it doesn't need the 2Gb like the PC, which is pretty obvious however I'm fairly positive that it will need more than 512.
And how did me asking a couple of straight-forward, easy questions about Battlefield 2 turn into an argument about consoles vs PCs?
Assclowns